Am Donnerstag 28 September 2006 21:14 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Note that Requires.private is used for cflags since the last version
> of pkg-config.
Interesting but maybe documenting Requires.private would be a good idea?
Hint: the manpage only mentions Libs.private, see #341977 #346602.
And 9 month
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:40:43PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> vali:/usr/lib/pkgconfig# pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
> >> -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
> >> -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/incl
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Note that Requires.private is used for cflags since the last version
> >of pkg-config. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/340904
>
> Well, then something wierd is going o
On 9/28/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vali:/usr/lib/pkgconfig# pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
> -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
I don't know what pkg-config is supposed to do, but surely you don't
need the freetype2 nor
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Note that Requires.private is used for cflags since the last version
> >of pkg-config. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/340904
>
> Well, then somet
On 9/28/06, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that Requires.private is used for cflags since the last version
of pkg-config. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/340904
Well, then something wierd is going on. I have 0.21-1 installed and I
get this. This first time is with Requires, the
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >Which is all crap. Yes, this is the list you need for static, but
> >pkg-config is recursing through modules even for dynamic linking which
> >is wrong. Now either pkg-config of the gtk+2 pc file needs to be
> >fixed, then you can start recompiling al
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:17:39PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >
> >The gtk+2 .pc file needs to be changed to mark a bunch of those Requires
> >as Requires.private, pkg-config provides all the necessary
> >infrastructure now. (If not, please do file bugs.)
>
> Ok, the reduces the libs
On 9/28/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout skrev:
> Which is all crap. Yes, this is the list you need for static, but
> pkg-config is recursing through modules even for dynamic linking which
> is wrong. Now either pkg-config of the gtk+2 pc file needs to be
> f
Martijn van Oosterhout skrev:
Which is all crap. Yes, this is the list you need for static, but
pkg-config is recursing through modules even for dynamic linking which
is wrong. Now either pkg-config of the gtk+2 pc file needs to be
fixed, then you can start recompiling all the affected programs.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> for file in $(wildcard debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/usr/lib/*.la); do \
> sed -i "/dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/" $$file ; \
> done
To use this feature, if you use CDBS, simply:
include /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:23:23PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass --as-needed flag
> >to the ld command line?
>
> Some of it is also pkg-config's fault. For example, anyone using
> pkg-config with gtk+2 gets the following:
>
> # pkg-c
Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 09:36 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty a écrit :
> In case it's of interest to anyone, I went through the checklib logs
> available on the web page for "problems" and found the libraries that
> are most often listed as bogus dependencies. Here are the top twenty
> offenders, li
* Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060926 18:37]:
> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la and .pc
> files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they link in.
There is also AC_PATH_XTRA, which just adds all X stuff when only few
may be needed.
Also note that X
On 9/26/06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
KBM> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la
KBM> and .pc files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they
KBM> link in.
Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass
Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:36:08AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> In case it's of interest to anyone, I went through the checklib
>> logs available on the web page for "problems" and found the
>> libraries that are most often listed as bogus dependencies.
>
> This
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:41:33PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass --as-needed flag
> to the ld command line?
As described in the other mails, --as-needed is a hack, and can
cause trouble.
I've also thought of a debhelper script stipping out u
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:36:08AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> In case it's of interest to anyone, I went through the checklib logs
> available on the web page for "problems" and found the libraries that
> are most often listed as bogus dependencies.
This seriously rocks. Thanks.
Actually th
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:36:08AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> In case it's of interest to anyone, I went through the checklib logs
> available on the web page for "problems" and found the libraries that
> are most often listed as bogus dependencies. Here are the top twenty
> offenders, li
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:41:33PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> KBM> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la
> KBM> and .pc files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they
> KBM> link in.
>
> Will this problem disappear i
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> KBM> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la
> KBM> and .pc files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they
> KBM> link in.
>
> Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass --as-needed flag
> t
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> KBM> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la
> KBM> and .pc files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they
> KBM> link in.
>
> Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass --as-needed flag
> t
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
KBM> Most of these are X-related, suggesting that quite a lot of .la
KBM> and .pc files are pretty indiscriminate about which X libs they
KBM> link in.
Will this problem disappear if end programs will pass --as-needed flag
to the ld command line?
--
JID: [EMAI
Christian Aichinger wrote:
> As a start, I've written a script that searches for unnecessary
> dependencies and reports them. Results are available here:
> http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib
>
> More detailed information about the meaning of the results are
> available on the web page, the two most
24 matches
Mail list logo
