Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:34:40 +0100
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2012/5/18 Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What
On Vi, 18 mai 12, 14:34:40, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
So I wouldn't blindly close those bug reports, and that's why I'm
triaging and handling them in my spare time.
Do you know how to retrieve those bugs with querybts(1) other than by
individual bug number?
Kind regards,
Andrei
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The BTS could then not just track the binary/source package of a bug
but also the meta-source package. That way when gcc-4.4 is removed
from the archive the bugs can still be associated with the gcc-x.y
meta package and won't be completly lost.
2012/5/19 Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com:
On Vi, 18 mai 12, 14:34:40, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
So I wouldn't blindly close those bug reports, and that's why I'm
triaging and handling them in my spare time.
Do you know how to retrieve those bugs with querybts(1) other
On Sb, 19 mai 12, 15:48:46, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
I don't know much about querybts, but you can ask for all [unarchived,
I think] bugs in package emacs21, for example:
For that you would have to know the package the bug was reported
against.
Hopefully somebody more
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist. What
should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep them for the
case, a package is re-introduced. But this might happen only for a few
packages. Most of them got removed because newer versions
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep them
for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might happen only for a
few
On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:50:12 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep
them for the
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net (18/05/2012):
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer)
exist. What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea
to keep them for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might
happen only for a few
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes:
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer)
exist. What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea
to keep them for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might
happen only for a few
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes:
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep them
for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might happen only for a
few
Hi,
2012/5/18 Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep them
for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might happen only for a
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:34:40 +0100
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2012/5/18 Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
What should happen to them? I see, that it might
2012/5/18 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org:
There's a big difference between these bugs and the rest - here there
are clear migration paths to later packages which can be used to triage
the bug reports in order not to lose reports. A lot of the rest *can*
be closed without more triage work
Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 17:41:55, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a écrit :
2012/5/18 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org:
There's a big difference between these bugs and the rest - here there
are clear migration paths to later packages which can be used to triage
the bug reports in order not
2012/5/18 Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr:
According to [1] salome is not part of any debian release now. Did I miss
something? IIRW, for package still in stable, if the -done mail contains the
right version then the bug will still be visible as long as it affects stable.
Oh yes,
On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:41:55 +0100
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question, perhaps unrelated is, what happens with the bugs
closed from egroupware or salome (removed from unstable/testing but
still present in stable releases) when their users look for
Hi!
On 18.05.2012 10:50, Paul Wise wrote:
Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist. What
should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea to keep them for the
case, a package is re-introduced. But this might happen only for a few
packages. Most of
18 matches
Mail list logo
