On 07/05/2011 12:35 PM, SP wrote:
> Has this been fixed in upstream? Is there a work around?
>
> Bug has been filed here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make/+bug/803882
Please file it in the debian bug tracker.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Devel
Apparently cp -s needs absolute paths. Yet dh_make tries to use it
relative paths (called from Debian dpkg-buildpackage version
1.15.8.10ubuntu1). Quoting relevant log below:
# Copy only the driver source to the proper location
cp -s driver/* debian/XXX-source/usr/src/modules/XXX
cp: `debian
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:54:19AM +, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > Should I fill a bug report ?
> By reading the changelog [1], it seems the maintainer has already
> accomplished that.
>
> [1] http://goo.gl/oomj3
Yes, see /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/
--
WBR, wR
On to, 2011-03-10 at 10:42 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> What is the status of dep5(*) copyright file in debian ? I am using
> dh_make for preparing packages, and I had report that the default
> generated copyright template should be replaced by a dep5 one.
> Should I fill
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Should I fill a bug report ?
By reading the changelog [1], it seems the maintainer has already
accomplished that.
[1] http://goo.gl/oomj3
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.
Hi,
What is the status of dep5(*) copyright file in debian ? I am using
dh_make for preparing packages, and I had report that the default
generated copyright template should be replaced by a dep5 one.
Should I fill a bug report ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
(*) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> dh_make does a good job of providing reasonable defaults, with one
> exception I have encountered.
[...]
> finally, I propose an addition be made to the new maintainer's guide
> to point out that
[...]
> again, I am new to
Hello,
I have recently started learning how to create debian packages.
I have some thoughts on what I see as an issue, and some thoughts on resolving
it. Keep in mind I have only been at this for a couple of days, so take this
with a grain of salt.
dh_make does a good job of providing
On Tue, 06 Oct 1998, John Lapeyre wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote:
>csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used
>"-g" for
>csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. I
*-John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote:
| csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used
"-g" for
| csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there a
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote:
csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g"
for
csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using
-O2 for
csmall>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g" for
> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using -O2 for
> C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugging symbols in all the
> binaries?
12 matches
Mail list logo