Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Steve Langasek writes (Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries): On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: FWIW, I don't agree that this is a fix. In one sense it makes /usr/lib cleaner by moving private libs into a private directory; however: There is at least one

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 04:24:18PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Steve Langasek writes (Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries): On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: FWIW, I don't agree that this is a fix. In one sense it makes /usr/lib cleaner by moving private

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:59:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mardi 13 novembre 2007 à 11:01 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : The current packages install the dynamic libraries simply to /usr/lib which I want to fix now. They should go to ${ARB_HOME}/lib FWIW, I don't

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: At installation time the filles will be installed to a directory ARB_HOME=/usr/lib/arb were the binaries go to ${ARB_HOME}/bin The current packages install the dynamic libraries simply to /usr/lib which I want to

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le mardi 13 novembre 2007 à 11:01 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : The current packages install the dynamic libraries simply to /usr/lib which I want to fix now. They should go to ${ARB_HOME}/lib FWIW, I don't agree that this is a fix. In one sense it makes /usr/lib cleaner

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: FWIW, I don't agree that this is a fix. In one sense it makes /usr/lib cleaner by moving private libs into a private directory; however: Well, I'm perfectly willing to adopt your suggestions, but I have to admit that the authors of this software do

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 08:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: snip Could anybody enlighten me what compiler options I have to give to enable compile time and runtime correctly working. I tried g++ ... -Lrpath /usr/lib/arb/lib ... -Lpkg-build-dir/lib which just caused /usr/bin/ld:

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:18:43AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: You should use -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/arb/lib instead of -Lrpath /usr/lib/arb/lib. Better use the shorter form -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/arb/lib. Bastian -- The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank. --

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-11-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I would like to seek for some clarification of the thread from September this year because I also have to use the rpath feature, but it became not really clear to me, how this has to be used. I need it for the package arb. At compile time the libraries are pkg-build-dir/lib/lib*.so

dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, _rene_ reported me a failure with openoffice and the new dpkg-shlibdeps. Scanning debian/openoffice.org-writer/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libswui680lp.so (for Depends field) dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libsw680lp.so (note: only packages with 'shlibs' files are

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On the other hand, maybe I should just be less picky for shared objects without SONAME... I'm not sure about it. I would suggest that, there are a few programs out there which use many internal use shlibs without a soname and a

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On the other hand, maybe I should just be less picky for shared objects without SONAME... I'm not sure about it. I would suggest that, there are a few

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libswui680lp.so has an RPATH set to $ORIGIN ... which is an environment variable apparently defined by the openoffice startup script/program. This variable is not set a build time (and the code wasn't expecting variables at that place anyway). I

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, _rene_ reported me a failure with openoffice and the new dpkg-shlibdeps. Scanning debian/openoffice.org-writer/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libswui680lp.so (for Depends field) dpkg-shlibdeps:

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:36:18AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libswui680lp.so has an RPATH set to $ORIGIN ... which is an environment variable apparently defined by the openoffice startup script/program. This variable is not set a build time

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries

2007-09-26 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
libswui680lp.so has an RPATH set to $ORIGIN ... which is an environment variable apparently defined by the openoffice startup script/program No. $ORIGIN is dynamic linker feature, it is expanded to the directory where executable resides. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a