ah yes of course. Thank you.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:07:17AM -0500, Pedro DeKeratry wrote:
> > I received the following warnings when building with dpkg-buildpackage
>
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pthread_sigmask used by
> > de
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:07:17AM -0500, Pedro DeKeratry wrote:
> I received the following warnings when building with dpkg-buildpackage
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pthread_sigmask used by
> debian/libyrp/usr/lib/libyrp.so.2.0.0 found in none of the libraries
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symb
I received the following warnings when building with dpkg-buildpackage
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pthread_sigmask used by
debian/libyrp/usr/lib/libyrp.so.2.0.0 found in none of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pthread_join used by
debian/libyrp/usr/lib/libyrp.so.2.0.0 found in no
On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:07:18 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009, Jiří Paleček wrote:
should
almost never happen (except diversion) and the result when it happens
is
Should I read it as "the only legal situation where it returns multiple
packages are diversions (the rest ar
On Fri, 01 May 2009, Jiří Paleček wrote:
>> should
>> almost never happen (except diversion) and the result when it happens is
>
> Should I read it as "the only legal situation where it returns multiple
> packages are diversions (the rest are errors)" or "the majority of
> situations ... are di
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:00:12 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Jiří Paleček wrote:
Yes, but even then, libGL.so.1 (the one used for building a package) is
only mentioned in one symbol file, namely the one from nvidia-glx, isn't
it (let's put aside the package doesn't feature
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Yes, but even then, libGL.so.1 (the one used for building a package) is
> only mentioned in one symbol file, namely the one from nvidia-glx, isn't
> it (let's put aside the package doesn't feature a symbol file)? Why
> should the libgl1-mesa-glx symbo
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:40:12 +0200, Josselin Mouette
wrote:
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 18:51 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've
found
that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in
two
different symbol
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 18:51 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
> I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've found
> that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in two
> different symbol files. I'd like to ask if (and when) can such situation
>
Hello,
I've hacked a little into dpkg-shlibdeps and while doing this, I've found
that the code makes allowance for a single library being mentioned in two
different symbol files. I'd like to ask if (and when) can such situation
actually arise.
Regards
Jiri Palecek
--
Using Opera's re
10 matches
Mail list logo