On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:42:05PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Josselin Mouette
> | Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> | > | Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
> | > | dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
> |
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 19:50 +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Monday, 9 January 2006 19:26, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > The gconf-sanity-check functionality is optional. As such, its
> >
> > Why is gconf-sanity-check optional? It seems pretty vital to me.
> AFAIK only gdm (or gnome-settings-daemon)
[Re-sending, my previous reply didn't made it.]
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
> to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
How so? Please show me a case where the bug will still be here.
> Y
On Monday, 9 January 2006 19:26, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > The gconf-sanity-check functionality is optional. As such, its
>
> Why is gconf-sanity-check optional? It seems pretty vital to me.
AFAIK only gdm (or gnome-settings-daemon) uses gconf-sanity-check and both
depend on libgtk2.0-0.
Best regar
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
> > to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
>
> How so? Please show me a case where the bug will
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 16:42 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> Because GTK exports and depends on the definitions of GLib (and pango,
> in this case) types, so if any of those definitions change, you must
> get the right ones.
That's why GTK itself depends on GLib and pango. I don't get your
* Josselin Mouette
| Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| > | Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| > | dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
| >
| > No, it's not. At least not in the way GTK & friends work.
|
| Why
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
> to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
How so? Please show me a case where the bug will still be here.
> You should _never_ exclude anything for the calcul
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> | Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
> | dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
>
> No, it's not. At least not in the way GTK & friends work.
Why so?
> | Of all binaries shipped w
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 03:09:34PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 14:28 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla a écrit :
> > /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
> > libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
> > fil
* Josselin Mouette
| > /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
| > libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
| > file or dir
|
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| dependencies is a very bad thin
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 14:28 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
> wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
> course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
> libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or dir
> gconf-sanity-check-2 did not pass, logging back out
I've filed a serious
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I need to log back in,
it kicks me out.
I don't have any s
"Alejandro Bonilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
> libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or dir
> gconf-sanity-check-2 did not pass, logging back out
Fun! :-/
> Which package gets t
Hi,
I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I need to log back in,
it kicks me out.
I don't have any special scripts, I just
16 matches
Mail list logo
