Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-03 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-05-02, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-03 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg. Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't read, I find really

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-03 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-05-03, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the MIA status of its only maintainer. On the contrary you have been speculating on the future (in)ability of someone to maintain gpg. Anyhow, my post has probably been too rude and I'm sorry for that, but I really don't think that

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.19.2109 +0100]: I just claimed (and I still do) that there is a process for (possible) MIA maintainers, which doesn't involve the debian-release list. There are better ways to let people know that this is what you think. This debian-release

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-04-19, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --=-DjuXQ9s0AhDVtNsDjVrA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le samedi 19 avril 2008 =E0 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a =E9crit : I intend to hijack GnuPG[1] It would be very

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: Yes. But after I have seen Laszlo Boszormenyi bughandling in sqlite3, I think I actually would prefer current maintainance of gnupg. 478980 and 478337 Whatever it might have happened on those 2 bug reports, which I haven't read, I

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, Various people can't reach him[2]. On the other hand, he seems to be active on Ubuntu[3], he joined to Launchpad security this january at least. Moritz Muehlenhoff noted[4] that it should be hijacked and get in shape for Lenny. Thus I have created a preliminary package[5] which fixes

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-26 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:00:38 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Various people can't reach him[2]. On the other hand, he seems to be active on Ubuntu[3], he joined to Launchpad security this january at least. Moritz Muehlenhoff noted[4] that it should be hijacked and get in shape for Lenny. Thus

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Christian Perrier
(moving to -devel as -release is not meant to be a discussion list Please note this is not directed at your post, which was appropriate for -release but my comments are IMHO not. CC'ing you in case you're not subscribed to -devel) Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Various

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Daniel Leidert
x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]: I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority important, I ask if the Release Team allow it. [..] And, BTW

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Clint Adams
[moving to -devel to make Christian happy] On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious reasons. Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'm

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Saturday 19 April 2008 22:25:31 Clint Adams wrote: And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious reasons. Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'm spending more time on my dayjob than Debian

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:37:57PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: gnupg is important package. PTS says: The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some co-maintainers. Suggestion: Can we replace 'should' with 'must'? Wrong problem - we don't need more maintainers

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Andreas Barth
* Clint Adams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 19:00]: [moving to -devel to make Christian happy] On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Andreas Barth
* Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 17:51]: x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]: I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a écrit : I intend to hijack GnuPG[1] It would be very nice to see GnuPG more actively maintained indeed. If you prepare an upload of the latest upstream version, it would be nice to synchronize with someone from the GNOME team so