Re: intent to package: coda (+ copyright question)

1998-04-09 Thread Anders Hammarquist
> I think it's clear the intent is to say that CMU is legally distributing AFS. > the terms under which CMU is distributing it are as stated above and are DFSG > compliant. I think that's all we're concerned with: the terms under which our > users can use, modify, and distribute the software. > >

Re: intent to package: coda (+ copyright question)

1998-04-09 Thread Gregory S. Stark
Anders Hammarquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This file contains some code identical to or derived from the 1986 > version of the Andrew File System ("AFS"), which is owned by the IBM > Corporation.This code is provded "AS IS" and IBM does not warrant > that it is free of infringemen

Re: intent to package: coda (+ copyright question)

1998-04-09 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > I'm looking into packaging CMU's coda distributed filesystem. It is based on > AFS, with enhancements to allow disconnected use. There are kernel drivers > for > it in the 2.1.x series and they are available as patches for the 2.0.x series. > > S

intent to package: coda (+ copyright question)

1998-04-08 Thread Anders Hammarquist
I'm looking into packaging CMU's coda distributed filesystem. It is based on AFS, with enhancements to allow disconnected use. There are kernel drivers for it in the 2.1.x series and they are available as patches for the 2.0.x series. Seeing that there are other kernel module packages available