On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:42:31AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The point being? We do not have to waste time with that now, at least not
> with the kernel. We still need not to get too trigger happy with hardware
> and firmware, but otherwise...
>
> I won't help a Microsoft window
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:00:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > > The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free
> > > Software".
> > > Such a win-port might indeed serve
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:00:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
> > Such a win-port might indeed serve some users. But for my own part, I do
> > have some
I agree totaly with you..
Manuel Segura
"Richard B. Kreckel" a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, A Mennucc1 wrote:
> [...]
> > -why is the 'win' port important?
> [...]
>
> (Sorry for dropping in late to this thread, I was too busy lately to
> follow debian-devel tightly.)
>
> The
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> Someone could always port Debian to the Windows kernel, but they should not
> call it Debian anymore, and it has no place in our archives (because it is
> contrib [or non-free?] and too big to be inserted in the contrib
> distrib
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
> Such a win-port might indeed serve some users. But for my own part, I do
> have some personal problems with making all free software win-compatible.
> Does it serve Fre
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, A Mennucc1 wrote:
[...]
> -why is the 'win' port important?
[...]
(Sorry for dropping in late to this thread, I was too busy lately to
follow debian-devel tightly.)
The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
Such a win-port might i
hi
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:21:41PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> > A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Why? well, there was no big consenous on any name; so I looked at the
> > > problem the other way around, and
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:09:03PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > Mingw requires that the program actually be able to build on a win32
> > system, but produces code that runs much faster, is far more stable
> > in my experience, and competes head to head with the same app
> > compiled for MSVC v
9 matches
Mail list logo
