>>"Brendan" == Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brendan> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some
Brendan> modules which were previously stand-alone, any package
Brendan> declaring a versioned[0] dependency on:
Brendan> libcgi-perl,
Brendan> needs to either have
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:57:50PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > If those package are still going to be shipped separately (because
> > they're going to evolve outside the perl core), then they should stay
> > in the archive and perl must add Provides for them. Hence, the user
> > can still
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
>> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
>> on:
>>
>> l
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:33:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray écrivait:
> while the build-depends on perl were updated, the build-depends for the
> new libdbi were not. You need to update all build-depends that might be
They were in 1.28-1.1 (NMU by Joey), but during the transition the
maintainer uploade
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea ?crivait:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> > >make testing though, we
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:51:18PM -0400, Clint Adams écrivait:
> > Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> > anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
>
> Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
> unfortunately the build-deps weren't upd
> Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
> anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8;
unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated, so it was autobuilt
inconsistently.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What happened to libdbi-perl ?
>
> Joey NMUed it in the pool, but it appears to not have been installed.
Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU
anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild.
--
see shy jo
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea écrivait:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account th
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
> packages that were a
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> If they depend on those packages and perl (>= 5.8.0)?
If they have any sort of versioned dependency on provides (we should make a
list of those), actually.
But since this is a non-local check, and hard to write, I guess tailoring it
to detect dependenci
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> > previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> > on:
> >
> > libdi
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> on:
>
> libdigest-md5-perl, libmime-base64-perl, libnet-perl,
> libtime-hires-perl, libstorab
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
>make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
>still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
>packages that were alrea
perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those
packages that were already NMU'd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep-available -F depends perlap
17 matches
Mail list logo
