On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:56:57PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next
release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly.
procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be
Essential: yes
Breaks: sysvinit-utils
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:42:13AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You must use versioned Replaces, and *not* versioned Breaks, for the case of
moving files between Essential packages. Since (as others have mentioned)
the version of sysvinit-utils that drops pidof needs to add a Pre-Dep ond
As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next
release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly.
procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be
Essential: yes
Breaks: sysvinit-utils 2.88dsf-43
Now, if there is a new Essential package, is that
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:56 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next
release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly.
procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be
Essential: yes
Breaks: sysvinit-utils
Hello,
2013-12-09 03:55, Ben Hutchings:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:56 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
As pidof is moving from sysvinit-utils to procps-base in the next
release, I want to check I've got the way dpkg handles flags correctly.
procps-base will contain the new pidof and will be
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:01:33AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
my first cut of it would be:
procps-base: pidof, ps, sysctl, pgrep, pkill
procps: pwdx, vmstat, tload, free, pmap, skill, slabtop, top, uptime,
watch, w, snice
procps-base is Essential and depends on libc6, libncurses,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:28:47AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:39:20PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I also wonder whether it would not be more sensible to split procps into
essential and non-essential binary packages. Aside from pidof, I bet
there are lots of
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:46:26PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Since we are talking about pidof, I'd like to note that pgrep is more
portable ;-)
They'll actually share some of the same codebase after this change.
pidof is bascially a cut-down pgrep.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:14:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
And is there a strong reason why we don't move whole procps into
essential?A
It used to be there and then it was decided it wasn't essential.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:39:20PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I don't think this is a sensible thing to ask. There may be lots of
scripts using pidof that their maintainers don't know about. I suggest
using codesearch.debian.net to find the packages.
For the three flags that might go, the
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in
discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new
home for pidof so it fits with similiar tools (pidof used to be in
procps in the dark ages). This means shortly that pidof will disappear
from
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in
discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new
home for pidof so it fits with similiar tools (pidof used to be in
procps in the dark ages). This
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 14:21 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Le 9 août 2013 13:39, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk a écrit :
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have
been in
discussion with the
Le 9 août 2013 13:39, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk a écrit :
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in
discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new
home for pidof so it fits
Since we are talking about pidof, I'd like to note that pgrep is more
portable ;-)
2013/8/9, Craig Small csm...@debian.org:
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in
discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new
home for pidof so it fits
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:10 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Besides my Debian duties I am also upstream for procps. I have been in
discussion with the sysvinit-tools upstream and they want to find a new
home for pidof so
16 matches
Mail list logo
