Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 11:44 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > On 17/06/2023 20.30, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > This is what I would do if the archive policy demands it. Won't affect > > transitional dhcpcd5 or dhcpcd-base. > > Ack. > > I'm not sure whether the transitional dhcpcd5 package should

Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 17/06/2023 20.30, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: This is what I would do if the archive policy demands it. Won't affect transitional dhcpcd5 or dhcpcd-base. Ack. I'm not sure whether the transitional dhcpcd5 package should have a versioned dependency on the "right" dhcpcd, either (=

Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 6:39 PM Guillem Jover wrote: > By reading #594672 and a quick skim over #551034, these seem to have > been the same project, but the version introduced later as dhcpcd5 was > a new major version with an incompatible redesign, which would break > on upgrade, that's why it

Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 11:39:51 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16: > > Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch. > > > > An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch. > > > > Personally, I'm fine with either marking the

Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 12:40 PM Étienne Mollier wrote: > Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16: > > Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch. > > > > An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch. > > > > Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bug as

Re: re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-17 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Martin-Éric, Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16: > (non-subscriber, please keep me in CC) Acknowledged. > Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch. > > An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch. > > Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bug

re-introduction of epoch? #1037190 dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy

2023-06-16 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
(non-subscriber, please keep me in CC) Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch. An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch. Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bug as WONTFIX or re-introducing the epoch for one specific binary target whose name