Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-24 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:42:28 +0200, Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Davide> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: >> >> > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old >> > libxm

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-24 Thread Roderich Schupp
Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > but the only problematic gnome library, afaik, is libglade and i just > recompiled it against libxml2 without changes. the fact that gnome 1.x The fact that you can rebuild packages against libxml2 with no or only trivial changes (e.g. replace "doc

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Peter Teichman's letter: > On 23 Apr 2001 20:58:57 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > libxml1 is not deprecated. It is the xml library used by the GNOME 1.x > platform. Until GNOME 2 is released, libxml1 will be in active use. > There are significant source-l

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > > > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. > > i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing > > libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyw

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:20:30PM -0400, Peter Teichman wrote: > On 23 Apr 2001 20:58:57 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. > > i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing > > libxml2-dev and rebuil

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. > i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing > libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a package from libxml1 to > libxml2 is quite easy, so i am

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Teichman
On 23 Apr 2001 20:58:57 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. > i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing > libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a package from libxml1 to > libxml2 is quite easy,

switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a package from libxml1 to libxml2 is quite easy, so i am about to file bugs agains those buggy packages. i am also