Dear dpkg team,
This is a new aspect of the well-known "a conffile that vanishes across
an upgrade can fool dpkg" bug. The conffile will not only be present
after the upgrade. Moreover, it will be left over if the package is
purged. I guess this might already be adressed by the Ubuntu patch, bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402526 pending
Bug#402526: dpkg: please consider correcting insane timestamp in changelog file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
tags 402526 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 23:54:57 +, J S Bygott wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.24
> Severity: minor
> Actually, this is a bug in all versions since 1.4.0.20
>
> The files 'changelog' and 'changelog.Debian' both contain an insane
> timestamp (year 2018 ins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 117783
Bug#117783: Depends: lines in dselect are cut off
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 117783 - unreproducible
Bug#117783: Depends: lines in dselect are cut off
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> th
On Tue December 12 2006 04:08, Michael Piefel wrote:
<...>
> > Not reproducible, no response from submitter... closing.
>
> ‘No response,’ well, I might have responded had I known that I was
> being talked to. The bug report is five years old, then you come and
> add something to the report and exp
Am Samstag, den 09.12.2006, 12:03 -0800 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
System:
> You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly,
> in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly.
Well, I’m waiting, Bruce. You sure are a funny guy. Let’s see, what did
you write
6 matches
Mail list logo
