Bug#613023: marked as pending

tag 613023 pending thanks Hello, Bug #613023 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=7ea2064 --- commit 7ea2064c46b77398a63d7f7a543ebcf08f7c74d2 Aut

Bug#619541: marked as pending

tag 619541 pending thanks Hello, Bug #619541 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=7ea2064 --- commit 7ea2064c46b77398a63d7f7a543ebcf08f7c74d2 Aut

Processed: Bug#613023 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 613023 pending Bug #613023 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: dpkg-source doesn't update ctime of patched files (with 3.0 (quilt) format) Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #613023 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Processed: Bug#619541 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 619541 pending Bug #619541 [dpkg] dpkg-source: internal error "Use of uninitialized value ..." (git) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#619541: dpkg-source: internal error "Use of uninitialized value ..." (git)

Hello, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Niels Thykier wrote: > We got a report in Lintian that dpkg 1.16.0 causes test failures in > Lintian; so I checked out dpkg 1.16.0 (commit: 893a04ba) and I > noticed that one of the failures are caused by dpkg-source choking > on our "empty-diff" test (see the log). Th

Bug#619541: dpkg-source: internal error "Use of uninitialized value ..." (git)

Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.0~ Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi We got a report in Lintian that dpkg 1.16.0 causes test failures in Lintian; so I checked out dpkg 1.16.0 (commit: 893a04ba) and I noticed that one of the failures are caused by dpkg-source choking

Bug#619131: New field Package-List in .dsc

* Raphael Hertzog [110324 16:20]: > > If it is only used to give hints to dak, what is the reason that this is > > in .dsc and not in .changes? (Or perhaps even only in .changes that also > > include a source package). > > Because this is information about the source package and not about the > up

Bug#619131: New field Package-List in .dsc

Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Bernhard R. Link wrote: >> If it really is in the .dsc files then it would be nice if it also >> could include the Architecture: of those packages. That would make it >> easier for things like reprepro to decide if there might be some binary >> packa

Bug#556637: dpkg: support for getting architecture from DEB_HOST_ARCH

tag 556637 - patch thanks On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jussi Hakala wrote: > The dpkg determines the architecture in which it's in from a build > time constant. This makes things difficult if we use host's dpkg to > operate on packages non-native to host, for example, with > scratchbox2. > > It would be

Processed: Re: Bug#556637: dpkg: support for getting architecture from DEB_HOST_ARCH

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 556637 - patch Bug #556637 [dpkg] dpkg: support for getting architecture from DEB_HOST_ARCH Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 556637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#619449: Add architecture qualifier parsing to libdpkg-perl

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Wookey wrote: > OK. I realised after posting this that there was already some very > similar code in dpkg 1.16.0 in natty. So I did a patch against that > here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/741433 > which is probably very close to what you are asking for.

Bug#605719: marked as pending

tag 605719 pending thanks Hello, Bug #605719 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=893a04b --- commit 893a04ba94f21ea068aa18a7b715769275b98892 Aut

Processed: Bug#605719 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 605719 pending Bug #605719 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-mergechangelogs complains about "urgency=low" Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#619131: New field Package-List in .dsc

Hi, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Do I understand this correction correctly that "dpkg-source -b" will > generate that when generating a source package. Yes. > This is put in the .dsc but everything that makes a Sources out of it > will need to remove it again (or have an unnece

Bug#619449: Add architecture qualifier parsing to libdpkg-perl

+++ Raphael Hertzog [2011-03-24 14:31 +0100]: > Hi, > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Wookey wrote: > > It is probably not hard to enforce this at a slightly higher level. > > Indeed, it may make sense to just parse any string after the :, then > > have higher-level checks for valid values. The multiarch s

Bug#596298: marked as done (Please add DEB_HOST_ABI / DEB_BUILD_ABI)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:57:43 +0100 with message-id <20110324145743.ga21...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#596298: Please add DEB_HOST_ABI / DEB_BUILD_ABI has caused the Debian Bug report #596298, regarding Please add DEB_HOST_ABI / DEB_BUILD_ABI to be marked as d

Bug#619131: New field Package-List in .dsc

* Raphael Hertzog [110324 15:14]: > ftpmasters requested a new field in the .dsc files to ease their work. > I just implemented it and it will be part of dpkg 1.16.0. > > This has been done on short notice so I wanted to inform policy people > so that you can review the discussions and the design

Bug#598922: marked as pending

tag 598922 pending thanks Hello, Bug #598922 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=84e9322 --- commit 84e9322448b3b9b227d80b667ef1274452d6fb3e Aut

Processed: Bug#598922 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 598922 pending Bug #598922 [libdpkg-perl] libdpkg-perl: should strip repeated non-significant spaces Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 598922: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#616096: marked as pending

tag 616096 pending thanks Hello, Bug #616096 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=c52cb59 --- commit c52cb59d6bc99dc02a0a63fd2c80fe544bf6d691 Aut

Processed: Bug#616096 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 616096 pending Bug #616096 [dpkg] dpkg: typing error in german man page Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 616096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616096 Deb

Bug#619131: marked as pending

tag 619131 pending thanks Hello, Bug #619131 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=0146724 --- commit 014672432452a6f6a18c44e733fece7938685370 Aut

Processed: Bug#619131 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 619131 pending Bug #619131 [dpkg] dpkg: new field in .dsc Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619131 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#619449: Add architecture qualifier parsing to libdpkg-perl

Hi, On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Wookey wrote: > It is probably not hard to enforce this at a slightly higher level. > Indeed, it may make sense to just parse any string after the :, then > have higher-level checks for valid values. The multiarch spec > explicitly says to reject anything other than :any (

Bug#619131: dpkg: new field in .dsc

>> The argument of saving something in terms of sizes is not much >> convincing to me, looking at the usual size of stuff we are dealing with >> anyways. A few more lines of text dont seem to matter, imo. It is also >> easier to work with them in shell scripts. > The size of the individual .dsc is

Bug#619131: dpkg: new field in .dsc

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > buxy mentioned to optimize this by leaving out all the binary entries > that are using the "default overrides". I don't much like this for two > reasons: First you would need to add two more fields, section/priority > to show what those defaults are, they