Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.1
Severity: normal
I installed dpkg 1.16.0.3 and tar 1.16-2. Both worked well.
I upgraded dpkg to 1.16.1. It was successful, but I couldn't
upgrade anything else:
$ sudo apt-get install dpkg-dev
[snip download messages]
debconf: delaying package configuration, since
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 642802 dpkg: Requires tar 1.23 from squeeze
Bug #642802 [dpkg] dpkg: 1.16.1 requires latest tar
Changed Bug title to 'dpkg: Requires tar 1.23 from squeeze' from 'dpkg: 1.16.1
requires latest tar'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
retitle 642802 dpkg: Requires tar 1.23 from squeeze
thanks
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 14:38:43 +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.1
Severity: normal
I installed dpkg 1.16.0.3 and tar 1.16-2. Both worked well.
I upgraded dpkg to 1.16.1. It was successful, but I
(Just clarifying a detail)
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
A patch to make this an optional feature, without some plan for how we can
get this turned on by default (either in dpkg-dev, or in debhelper where it
would benefit the majority of packages) is not worth the effort. We've
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:48:02AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
- } elsif (m/^Build-(Depends|Conflicts)(-Indep)?$/i) {
+ } elsif (m/^Build-(Depends|Conflicts)(-Arch|-Indep)?$/i) {
That’s all it takes? Looks very sane.
The only missing pieces I see are some tiny nits mentioned
Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm a bit busy for the next week (thesis submission), but I'll take
care of all the points you've raised in early October as time allows,
and I'll get an updated patch back to you.
Thanks. Here's another tweak to consider when the time comes.
With the proposed semantics,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 07:11:00PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
(Just clarifying a detail)
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
A patch to make this an optional feature, without some plan for how we can
get this turned on by default (either in dpkg-dev, or in debhelper where it
7 matches
Mail list logo