# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.17
#
# dpkg (1.14.17) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Forward port a patch from the old changelog parser to the new
#one that got lost during the transition. '+' and '.' can now
#be used in distribution names yet again.
a good reason why it shouldn't.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:33:06PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:30:31PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
reassign 466321 libncurses5 5.6+20080203-1
severity 466321 important
thanks
Downgrading to libncurses5 5.6+20080119-1 fixes the problem.
Assign it back
that the ncurses library is a more likely suspect than
dselect itself.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the Policy Manual for
most of the details, but it clarifies the basic syntax and provides an
example.
Thanks. I've applied your patch (with some formatting changes).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
on the version of gcc/g++/whatever used,
so it's quite meaningless to make it dependent on the version of
dpkg-dev you use.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:52:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please find attached a patch which implements setting a set
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Granted my perl-fu is not that strong, and looking at the documentation,
I might have exaggerated the extent of this bug somewhat.
Could you please go into more
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Granted my perl-fu is not that strong
}} = $flags{$flag};
+ print $progname: set ${flag} to default value: $ENV{${flag}}\n;
+}
+if ($ENV{${flag}_APPEND}) {
+ $ENV{${flag}} .= .$ENV{${flag}_APPEND};
+}
+}
+
my $cwd = cwd();
my $dir = basename($cwd);
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:58:25AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hrm, the whole split(/\s+/) is somewhat ugly (and BTW not documented for the
-R option). Please do not commit before the upcoming upload, to give
us a chance to think that over
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 06:29:27AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
It could be related to the OABI compat layer. Which kernel version are
you guys using?
I have a Debian etch arm system here (2.6.18-5-ixp4xx) with a sid
chroot.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
)
This assert is comin from the rm binary, and seems quite fishy. Is that
system ok otherwise, fs, kernel, memory etc?
yes, a thecus running armel, with an arm chroot.
Can't reproduce this on my slug.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
;
+
+ if ($sourceonly) {
+ warning(_g(This is currently a non-fatal warning with -S, but));
+ warning(_g(will probably become fatal in the future.));
+ } else {
+ exit 3;
+ }
}
}
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I would leave the bug open. While I have no intentions to hack something
like this into the current version of dpkg-parsechangelog, I would not
say that it is a thing not ever
not commit before the upcoming upload, to give
us a chance to think that over.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:05:29PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I'm not sure yet if I will make a patch for this bug but one can work
around the limitations of dpkg-parsechangelog by using grep-dctrl:
dpkg-parsechangelog | grep-dctrl -ensVersion -FSource .
With the --format rfc822
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
# note my intend to close this
tags 284664 wontfix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:07:20PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Though I think that -d and -c can be interesting, so I wrote a new patch
to support them (it's attached). I'll apply it for dpkg 1.14.17.
You really should add a option to set Build-Depends-Indep then, too.
Gruesse,
--
Frank
satisfied.
I'm leaning towards correctness if it doesn't break too many stuff.
Alternatively, we could make it display a warning and not actually exit.
And this warning can itself warn that in the future it might fail at that
point if -d is not passed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
, or to put up a debian
mirror site or repository containing arbitrary code
disguised as legitimate Debian software and having the same
checksums.
dpkg does at no time verify anything about the origin of packages.
Only apt does.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
/ConffileHandling
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/${crossprefix}/lib,
+/${crossprefix}/lib32, /usr/${crossprefix}/lib32,
+/${crossprefix}/lib64, /usr/${crossprefix}/lib64,
+/emul/ia32-linux/lib, /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib );
+}
Why do you add /emul/ia32-linux/lib, /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib again?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
# note that this bug is also found in the version in testing
found 452730 1.14.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 446119 confirmed
thanks
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:39:21AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
As the subject says:
confirmed. Silly bug, really. Thanks for catching.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
While updating the German man pages translation, I noticed the
following minor errors, given as patch respective to the pot files.
The whitespace issues are po4a's fault, but the rest should be fixed
now.
Gruesse,
--
Frank
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:24:48PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:28:05PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Here I am unsure, please verify:
-shlibs.local, B/etc/dpkg/shlibs.override, the Bshlibs
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
# make the BTS display more sensible
found 41907 1.14.1.6
found 395942 1.13.24
found 109954 1.19.17
found 430367 1.14.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
, and with version 1.14.6 it is all ok. I have the
latest version of Perl present in unstable.
These don't look like perl errors, but like shell errors. Somehow the
perl script gets executed as shell script. Do you have dpkg-cross
installed?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
, of multiple B-i options only the last one
will
Yeah, change looks good.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
detected earlier on.
This behaviour is as old as dpkg-checkbuilddeps itself (see
cf5d2919f686a15e8e623130b74af3ba2428fbeb in git).
Changing the behaviour would obviously be correct, the question is
whether it would actually be better.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
-06 Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * deb-control.5: Move description of
+ version format to...
+ * deb-version.5: Take the section from
+ policy describing version format and
+ sorting since this is probably as good
+ as it gets for describing
++-
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index b1eafab..8ad0186 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2007-10-06 Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Support a subset
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:09:21PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Use .orig.tar.(bz2|lzma) if they are available
and no .gz can be found. Also let the user specify
via -C(gz|bz2|lzma) how files that need to be
generated should be compressed.
Hmm, I just noticed that dpkg-genchanges already
the problem and verified diff's behaviour.
Solution of the Problem
===
The attached patch solves the problem, by appending a tab character (\t) to
the labels that dpkg-source
assigns using the -L option.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
code in openssl.preinst
if [ -L /etc/ssl ]
then
echo Removing obsolete link /etc/ssl
rm /etc/ssl
fi
_might_ have something to do with that behaviour...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
think, Frank?
I don't find it unreasonable to somehow warn about unknown architectures
but the current code errors out completly and gives a very misleading
error message. So in my opinion the patch is an improvement.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
Logical opposite of -B, will include only arch-indep
packages into the upload.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ChangeLog|8
scripts/dpkg-buildpackage.pl | 20 ++--
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 25
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
# non-trivial patch against old shell version
tags 247824 - patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
# wrong bugnumber
tags 229357 + patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
# non-trivial patch against old shell version
tags 229357 - patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
more than one of these three flags [-q, -t, -n] in the
same
invocation of `make'.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doubled code in all
tools that might want to use the new format. Plus a working reference
implementation (that doesn't need to be very user friendly, just as
complete as possible) would probably do wonders for testing and
advertising of the new format.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:55:56PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:46:26PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
Lintian (and Policy?) requires the Debian changelog to be UTF-8
encoded. But if -- for example, -- the maintainer name is encoded
build fine.
Running debian/rules clean manually also works fine.
Hmm, seems to new dpkg-buildpackage doesn't like an empty rootcommand.
Will be fixed in the next upload. If you need a workaround, using
fakeroot or sudo should work.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 12:25:54PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
* Sun 2007-09-23 Frank Lichtenheld djpig AT debian.org INBOX
Below new patch according to comment.
Looks much better.
+my $ignore_tar_default_regexp =
+.[#~]*
+*[#~]
+'{arch}'
the quotes don't belong here.
+.a
This should
is requested by
#28701
dpkg-genchanges should compare the version numbers, IMHO)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= done;
} elsif (m/^-V(\w[-:0-9A-Za-z]*)[=:]/) {
$substvar{$1}= $';
} elsif (m/^-T/) {
looks like inconsistent whitespace.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
to change the default behaviour of dpkg-source would
be the addition of wigpen build support, BTW ;)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and bzip, though.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] \
( [ $signchanges != : ] || ( [ -z $binaryonly ] [ $signsource
!= : ] ) ) ; then
@@ -281,7 +284,7 @@
fi
if $cleansource; then
- withecho $rootcommand debian/rules clean
+ withecho $rootcommand $makecommand -f debian/rules clean
fi
echo dpkg-buildpackage: $srcmsg
Gruesse,
--
Frank
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
# on second thought they are not exactly the same
unmerge 435126
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or an upgrade 1.14.5
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
severity 430463 wishlist
tag 430463 - moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Since nobody so far seems to have encountered the same problem I'm
inclined to close
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:22:28PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:08:02AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
dpkg-dev. On the other hand the current maintainer scripts handle
upgrade issues for even more ancient versions. So I'm a bit reluctant
Forgive my ignorance
parameters are not UTF-8 encoded. Passing
- --utf8-strings to gpg solves the problem.
Patch attached.
Can you give me a quick example that demonstrates the difference?
I can't seem to find one.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
complete and less confusing patch would probably have to store
the original string before the leading and trailing '*' are inserted,
escape all wildcards in it, then conditionally add the '*'s and
make every match twice, one time with the escaped string.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:23:33PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 06:16:31PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Just for the record, I would opose both patches on the ground of very
confusing and undefined behaviour.
Also, if this is not intended to work, it's okay to close
to the repository with the
understanding that he limits himself to the branch integrating his work
for now (I really see no need for technical measures enforcing that, we
are all grown-ups, right?)
Objections? Comments?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
1) Apply the part of the patch that adds the modules. Since that doesn't
add anything useful to dpkg in its own right, we should probably make
this in a branch
2) Do some code clean-up
3) Add a minimal test suite
? (At least for all
remotely practical umask settings...)
Will apply the patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wether a package does delete additional data
(like e.g. debconf or ucf data) in case of a purge or not.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
directories with symlinks is
probably because this would effectively require a rm -fr on the
directory (or the creation of potentially very big backups)
which is not a very good thing to do non-interactively.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, #313605.
Reinstalling coreutils (5.94-1) fixes the glitch.
Do you know which versions of coreutils and dpkg you had installed
before the upgrade? Do you have the full upgrade log available?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
as policy?
- What kind of fields should it contain? Should it make a clear
distinction between fields used by dpkg and fields ignored by it?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
for correcting my stupid mistakes,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
negating a simple int
(i.e. the type pid_t is defined to) with an (according to strace)
well defined value could cause an error like that.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:00:36PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Certainly. But I can't see any way how negating a simple int
(i.e. the type pid_t is defined to) with an (according to strace)
well defined value could cause an error like that.
But I have now found a way to reproduce this bug
Hi Colin.
This bug still needs some more information what exactly it
is about. Without this information it doesn't really make sense to keep
it open.
[also CCed the submitter this time]
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
then.
If noone can provide more information about it (best with an
example how to reproduce it) it will need to be closed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
on this, this
bug should probably be closed as unreproducible.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.19
Severity: minor
If with --quiet, s-s-d --test shouldn't output anything to stdout. Instead,
--test is ignoring --quiet completly.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:35:21AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'd like to unify the help output format for all the scripts before
translators have a chance
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:31:48AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:17:16PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Unfortunatly I also discovered that your patch isn't really applicable
because of a simple fact: It violates the semantics of Conflicts
relations. If a package
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:46:20PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 04:43:31AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
I can't think of any reason. When I hit Z and press enter, the message
gets printed and then the conffile prompt comes right back up
. And your patch violates that
assumption. So in the end I'm now convinced that there is only one
solution that will both fix the problem and be according to policy
(see above).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
from stdin would probably have to
be added seperatly.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
time ago.
It isn't used anymore anywhere in dpkg but I will add amd64
none-the-less since it explicetly states that it lists the architectures
that are in the official archive for sid.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
. Directly after the message the
following commands gets executed:
kill(-getpgid(0),SIGTSTP);
Do you know of any reason why this might fail in your case?
If not I can prepare a patch that adds actual error checking to
that peace of code.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I think you misread my question. I totally see that there should be two
.pot files, I only asked if we really need two directories for that...
Two set of .pot files
not deprecate it to
retain some control over the date format used in Debian packages).
Current users of 822-date includes e.g.
- devscripts
- dh-make
- equivs
- sbuild
- debmake
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Index: debian/changelog
;
+ }
if (isdirectoryinuse(namenode,pkg)) continue;
}
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:49:32PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I have an alternative patch that at least fixes the defoma/ttf-bitstream
case. I haven't tested all the other packages yet. Comments and
testing welcome.
Cases that this patch doesn't fix include openssl/ca-certificates
and tex
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 08:59:24PM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:18:42 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I think you misread my question. I
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:49:32PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I have an alternative patch that at least fixes the defoma/ttf-bitstream
case. I haven't tested all the other packages yet. Comments and
testing welcome.
Updated patch that also deals with the similar case on upgrade.
Index
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 01:28:53AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:59:16PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
So here is the new patch.
It differentiates 3 categories of fields:
* Depends|Pre-Depends
Compute an intersection
* Replaces|Conflicts|Provides
patch to
use that, too.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be right. Feel free to apply the patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/nrpe.cfg.divert.custom', not allowed
Restarting nagios-nrpe: nagios-nrpe.
Purging configuration files for nagios-plugins-custom ...
Could you please send us the output of dpkg --debug=
for these actions? This would help to determine what dpkg
is actually doing and why.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
the bug open. While I have no intentions to hack something
like this into the current version of dpkg-parsechangelog, I would not
say that it is a thing not ever worth thinking about.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
for that...
I'd like to unify the help output format for all the scripts before
translators have a chance to start working on them, though.
ACK.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
* Replaces|Conflicts|Provides
Compute an union
* Recommends|Suggests|Enhances
Only merge the dependencies if they are identical
Great, I will try to give it a thourough review in the next days.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
the different fields
differently.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the following prompt:
Upgrade from which version to which version? Where can we find the .debs
to reproduce it?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
I'm not yet sure what way I would prefer...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a quick comment on this one: IMHO solving this essentially
depends on someone proposing a way to handle or'ed build-dependencies
in a useful way...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
severity 186809 normal
merge 186809 178203
thanks
One half of this bug report is really wontfix (the second one). But as
the other one adds a valid point to another bug (source package aspect)
I will merge it there instead of closing it or marking it wontfix.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
