Re: Repeat the anti-software-patent campaign? It's back, and it's worse now! (URL)

2004-03-08 Thread Thomas Templin
On Monday 08 March 2004 16:22, Herman Robak wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 15:19, Thomas Templin wrote: > > On Saturday 06 March 2004 23:01, Herman Robak wrote: > > > The EU council has circulated a "compromise" counter-proposal > > ... > > > > Calling it a "compromise" is highly desceptive; it's >

Re: Repeat the anti-software-patent campaign? It's back, and it's worse now! (URL)

2004-03-08 Thread Herman Robak
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 15:19, Thomas Templin wrote: > On Saturday 06 March 2004 23:01, Herman Robak wrote: > > The EU council has circulated a "compromise" counter-proposal ... > > Calling it a "compromise" is highly desceptive; it's > > much worse than the original. But they press on, ... > FFII,

Re: Repeat the anti-software-patent campaign? It's back, and it's worse now! (URL)

2004-03-08 Thread Thomas Templin
Hi Herman On Saturday 06 March 2004 23:01, Herman Robak wrote: > The EU council has circulated a "compromise" counter-proposal > to the decision made by the EU parliament last year on the > patentability of software. > > Calling it a "compromise" is highly desceptive; it's > much worse than the ori

Repeat the anti-software-patent campaign? It's back, and it's worse now! (URL)

2004-03-06 Thread Herman Robak
The EU council has circulated a "compromise" counter-proposal to the decision made by the EU parliament last year on the patentability of software. Calling it a "compromise" is highly desceptive; it's much worse than the original. But they press on, and it looks as if they will get through with it