Re: building gcc cross compilers

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > for gcc-2.95.3, building cross compilers should work ok. You need to > set the TARGET in the rules files and you are done. You may want to > contact Steve for further information. The patch for the rules file > comes from the Emdebian project. Cross co

building gcc cross compilers

David Schleef writes: > > What is the status of building cross compilers with the > debian source packages? I can get them to build after > fighting with it for a while, but it's a bit fragile. > It appears as though building cross compilers worked in > the recent past, but that changes hav

Bug#91512: marked as done (problem with atexit and shared libraries)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:37 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95-2.95.3-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#90370: marked as done (I can not install the package because of 'error code (1)')

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:37 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95-2.95.3-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

building gcc cross compilers

What is the status of building cross compilers with the debian source packages? I can get them to build after fighting with it for a while, but it's a bit fragile. It appears as though building cross compilers worked in the recent past, but that changes have been made that break it -- is someone

gcc-2.95_2.95.3.ds5-9_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.3-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.3-9_i386.deb gcj-2.95_2.95.3-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcj-2.95_2.95.3-9_i386.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.3-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.3-9_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.3-9_i386.deb

gcc-defaults override disparity

There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): gobjc_2.95.3-6_i386.deb: priority is overridden from standard to optional. gcj_2.95.3-6_i386.deb: priority is overridden from standard to optional. g77_2.95.3-6_i386.deb: priority is overr

gcc-2.95 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.3-9_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to standard. libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.3-9_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the pac

gcc-defaults_0.6_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: gobjc_2.95.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gobjc_2.95.3-6_i386.deb gcj_2.95.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj_2.95.3-6_i386.deb g77_2.95.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_2.95.3-6_i386.deb cpp_2.95.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95

Bug#92022: Change to Suggests

Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-8 Severity: normal Spotted by apt-cache unmet. Currently you Suggests: task-devel, which is not available. Perhaps you mean task-c-dev or task-devel-common? Gordon Sadler -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux h

Bug#91512: Temporary hack

Using "gcc -u atexit" instead of gcc seems to be a temporary solution for people who need to compile things before the new gcc is available. -- Bruce Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect http://www.MessagingDirect.com/>