Bug#94576: libgcj300-dev should conflict with libgcj0

2001-04-19 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Package: libgcj300-dev Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403 Severity: normal (Reading database ... 76899 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgcj300-dev (from .../libgcj300-dev_1%3a3.0-0pre010403_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgcj300-dev_1%3a3.0-0pre01040

Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2

2001-04-19 Thread Nick Holgate
> 2.2.19 with current kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k fails with 2.95.2, so there Can you tell me which version you call current? Have you tried kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k_2.2.19-3? I thought I had fixed the missing __muldi3 symbol problem. Nick ---

Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2

2001-04-19 Thread Simon Richter
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hirst wrote: > > The idea is to see whether m68k can live without gcc 2.7.2, since we seem > > to be the last platform depending on it and the maintainer wants to drop > > the package. > Oh, sorry - I missed that point. Certainly I've built and run 2.3.x and > 2.4.x

Re: gcc-2.95

2001-04-19 Thread Neal H Walfield
> Is there a way to determine the amount of free memory (including free > swap)? Absolutely; take a look at mach/mach.defs:vm_statistics and . pgpa45jjrq7pm.pgp Description: PGP signature