I don't want to put this in the BTS because I *know* gcc-3.0 is beta.
The libstdc++3 package contains a libtool file /usr/lib/libstdc++.la, which
points libtool at /usr/lib/libstdc++.so, which doesn't exist.
So, if you've got libstdc++3 installed, you can't use libtool to build C++
programs,
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:18:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
I don't want to put this in the BTS because I *know* gcc-3.0 is beta.
The libstdc++3 package contains a libtool file /usr/lib/libstdc++.la, which
points libtool at /usr/lib/libstdc++.so, which doesn't exist.
So, if you've got
that get's difficult, because some architectures do use these
libraries (and gcc-3.0) as the default. I am unsure if it's worth to
reset these priorities, when migrating to 3.0.
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:35:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #95318,
regarding gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:39:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #97904,
regarding gcc-3.0: Pointless moving
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 43170 [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a
class
Bug#43170: Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class
Changed Bug title.
forwarded 43170 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 63546 amaya
Bug#63546: mistranslation of amaya on ix86
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `amaya'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010525
Severity: normal
libstdc++3 has a versioned depend for libgcc0
I would suggest gcc-3.0 should as well. Currently it is unversioned.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian-home 2.2.19 #1 Sat May 19
8 matches
Mail list logo