ash vs. gcc-3.0

I was looking into the gcc-3.0 vs. ash problem and a google search found this bug report on the Debian system. Although this bug has apparently been closed, I don't see an actual resolution of the problem anywhere. If there is a fix for it, I would appreciate knowing. I am not a Debian

Bug#105986: Please let gcc tell me the error :)

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403 Severity: wishlist This in an issue with both gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95. I just tried to compile my project and got the following message (after tons of make-stuff): make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/thimo/UG/course/appl/couplex' gcc-3.0 -o course2d debug.o

Processed: Re: Bug#105986: Please let gcc tell me the error :)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 105986 binutils Bug#105986: Please let gcc tell me the error :) Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `binutils'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#105622: Test case

retitle 105622 [m68k] Generates invalid asm instruction with -O2 thanks OK, here is the test case. I stripped out everything specific to Hercules, and removed as many statements as possible. If I change pretty much any of what's left, the bug doesn't occur. To reproduce: [EMAIL

Processed: Test case

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 105622 [m68k] Generates invalid asm instruction with -O2 Bug#105622: failed autobuild of hercules_2.12-2 (m68k): assembly errors Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Bug#105622: Test case

Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/unstable/build/mdz/hercules-2.12$ cc -O2 -c test.c /tmp/cc23gVSZ.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc23gVSZ.s:69: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `add.l %a4,-20(%a6)' ignored Attached patch fixes this. Matthias, the same bug still exists in 3.0.

Bug#106049: gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0-1 I tried to report a bug in gcc from paer.d.o using the automated gccbug tool. It didn't work properly. See the rejection message I received below. Basically the To: field isn't properly generated. Thanks. - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL

Bug#106049: marked as done (gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:28:52 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#106049: gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not