Bug#149097: marked as done (gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ??? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#152501: java/7304: gcj-3.1 ICE

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `java/7304'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. Category: java Responsible:unassigned Synopsis: gcj-3.1 ICE Arrival-Date: Sun Jul 14 04:36:01 PDT 2002 -- To

Bug#149561: bad pathnames coded into the libs

Philip Blundell writes: The binaries have to be built in some directory, and whatever pathname is used will end up embedded in the debug information. There's not a lot we can do about this. therefore closing the repot. adding a paragraph about debugging libstdc++ for the next upload. -- To

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #151357 to gcc-gnats as PR c++/7306

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 151357 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#151357: gcc-3.0 fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 151357 [PR c++/7306] gcc-3.x fails to

Bug#151618: marked as done (g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:54 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#151618: g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 150357 wishlist Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency Severity set to `wishlist'. tags 150357 + wontfix Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm

reassign 151675 gcc-2.95 tags 151675 + fixed retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm thanks Gerrit Pape writes: Package: gcc Severity: normal Hello, compiling tryulong32.c on arm with gcc-2.95.2-13.1 and the -O option seems to cause an infinite loop in cc1,

Processed: Re: Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 151675 gcc-2.95 Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'. tags 151675 + fixed Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm Tags added: fixed retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc:

Bug#151357: c++/7306: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode

Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 08:23:28 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. A regression from GCC 2.95.

Processed: Re: Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 150966 general Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `general'. tags 150966 + moreinfo Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report

Processed: Re: Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 150558 + fixed Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div' Tags added: fixed retitle 150558 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `div'

Re: Testsuite failure

yes, some gcc-2.95 uploads were tested against the gcc-3.0 testsuite. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I mailed earlier about the testsuite failing. I've found a similar output from somebody else on

Processed: reassign to kdelibs for proper bug report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 143138 kdelibs Bug#143138: artsd crashes caused by -fomit-frame-pointer ! Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kdelibs'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: #64832 fixed in gcc-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 64832 + fixed Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k Tags added: fixed retitle 64832 [fixed in gcc-3.1] gcc optimizer bug on m68k Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#122511: gcc: illegal instructions and bad jump offsets when VMA != LMA

Please could you retry this with the current gcc-3.1 version found in unstable? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-4 Severity: normal This one's not easy to diagnose on my end. I'll cut and paste objdump's with --source to give an idea of the flavor. Similar bugs

Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch

Philip Blundell writes: On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 20:26, Martin v. Loewis wrote: I don't think that a Debian bug report is the right place to push a patch into gcc (i.e. to lobby for it). Instead, you should assume that all patches that have been submitted to gcc-patches are implicitly

Bug#149463: marked as done (There should be a gcc version with stack protection patch)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack protectionpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#151357: c++/7306: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode

Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number of argument methode Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned-nathan Responsible-Changed-By: nathan Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 10:59:24 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: working on a patch

Bug#149097: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???)

On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 06:18:08AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???, which was filed against the gnat-3.1-doc package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely

Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???

Eric G. Miller writes: It is included: gnat-rm-3.1 I believe you're mistaken. The gnat-rm covers the implementation of portions of the Ada Reference Manual, along with some extensions, but it does not actually include the text of the Ada95 Reference Manual. Please compare the contents of

Bug#151196: gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code

Petr Vandrovec writes: On 12 Jul 02 at 9:22, Matthias Klose wrote: retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code tags 151196 + fixed thanks My system still runs 'gcc-2.95.4' when I type 'gcc', so how it comes that you tag this fixed? I could understand

Re: libffi2 - gcj = Java

Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes: Hello All does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ? to get a gcj on this port ... AFAIK nobody has started a port yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [parisc-linux] Re: libffi2 - gcj = Java

Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes: Hello All does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ? to get a gcj on this port ... AFAIK nobody has started a port yet. James Mc Parlane may be working on this. There was a question re calling conventions back on May 17. Dave -- J. David

Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken

reassign 150755 ccache thanks Michel LESPINASSE writes: On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Ok, I didn't work with profiling before. Please could you send me a small example program and a Makefile to show the problem? Yes. However in the mean time I have

Processed: Re: Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 150755 ccache Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `ccache'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#146850: marked as done (chill-2.95 leaves broken info link behind)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:32:33 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#146850: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds13-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???

Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ARM] well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this manual ... Sam? Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or Laurent Guerby. Laurent Guerby did the work

Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???

Florian Weimer writes: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ARM] well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this manual ... Sam? Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or Laurent Guerby. The current version of the manual

gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb