Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
Severity: important
There is a build regression of wmcoincoin on s390 between GCC 2.95 and
GCC 3.0, which is caused by the optimisation flags. See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=wmcoincoinver=2.4.3c-1arch=s390stamp=1043265213file=logas=raw
Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
The autobuilder takes the first package of a list of alternatives, so
the current source will only auto-build on machines that
GCC 3.2 still uses CMOVE instructions on -march=i686.
On the other hand:
{c3, PROCESSOR_I486, PTA_MMX | PTA_3DNOW},
GCC disagrees with you that the C3 is an i686.
gcc uses i486 scheduling because that gives best performance
The situation is as follows
gcc i686 definition is wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
already fixed in the debian cvs.
The autobuilder takes the first package of a list of
At Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:39:43 -0500 (EST),
Alan Cox wrote:
GCC 3.2 still uses CMOVE instructions on -march=i686.
On the other hand:
{c3, PROCESSOR_I486, PTA_MMX | PTA_3DNOW},
GCC disagrees with you that the C3 is an i686.
gcc uses i486 scheduling because that gives best
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:39:06AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:39:43 -0500 (EST),
Alan Cox wrote:
GCC 3.2 still uses CMOVE instructions on -march=i686.
On the other hand:
{c3, PROCESSOR_I486, PTA_MMX | PTA_3DNOW},
GCC disagrees with you that the C3 is
I think it may be needed that we add -mcpu=c3 for gcc, which generates
i686 without cmov instruction.
You want i486 scheduling for the C3 from testing so far. I've been talking
to VIA about releasing all the optimisation info
Alan
Okay, sorry this has taken so long.
I've put a gij-wrapper-3.2 and a gcj-wrapper-3.2 up on
http://people.debian.org/~bab/java if you want to take a look.
I've done some basic testing and everything seems to be in order, but I
wouldn't mind doing a little more testing with some of the more
8 matches
Mail list logo
