On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 07:28:46AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies writes:
> > Hi,
> > please check the log for failed build of gcc-snapshot_20030314-1 for m68k.
> >
> > echo regex.o cplus-dem.o cp-demangle.o md5.o alloca.o argv.o choose-temp.o
> > concat.o
> > dyn-string.o f
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 16:24, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If it weren't for the disk/archivespace/maintenance/PITA cost I'd
> suggest binary-i686. Things being what they are, maybe we should poll
> for people interested in new versions of Debian on i386; I doubt we can
> drop 586, since I've seen u
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:24:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> >
> > Debian already hurts the x86 users (IMHO) by giving them a compiler
> > targetted for processor which, I'd bet, is used by less than 2% of the
> > user base.
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 14 19:22:27 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi
Hello,
You have been carbon-copied because your package lists libgmp3-dev in
its build-depends.
Philipp & I have recently taken over maintenance of the GMP libraries
and uploaded version 4.1.2. The package libgmp3-dev has for some time
installed internal GMP headers into /usr/include. The ratio
Alan Modra writes:
> This should fix it.
>
> * combine.c (force_to_mode ): Use gen_int_mode.
checked with 3.3 branch, no additional failures in testsuite.
Matthias
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 08:32:26PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:49:44PM +0100, Sebastian Wilhelmi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The file /usr/include/c++/3.2/i386-linux/bits/ato
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 08:32:26PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:49:44PM +0100, Sebastian Wilhelmi wrote:
> > > Package: libstdc++5-dev
> > > Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre5
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > The file /usr/include/c++/3.2/i386-linu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 182277 binutils
Bug#182277: gcc-3.2: Should print a warning when using (v)sprintf.
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `binutils'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 178965 [PR 10113, 3.2/3.3/3.4 sparc regression] ICE when optimizing
> (gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662)
Bug#178965: g++-3.2: sparc regression, ICE when optimizing (gen_reg_rtx, at
emit-rtl.c:662)
Changed Bug title.
> forwarded 178965 http://gc
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `target/10113'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: target
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 sparc regression] ICE when optimizing
>(gen_reg_rtx, at
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `target/10114'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: target
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 sparc regression] ICE when optimizing
>(mem_loc_descrip
Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:22:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-3.2 produces bad code?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please recheck with the current gcc-snapshot package, if the code
> example works ok.
>
> If the problem persists, please post a test case (maybe preprocessed
> source), not just an excerpt from the source file.
>
> Thanks, Matthia
Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:02:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgcj/9078: libffi: problems with uint8 on powerpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:11:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184137: libffi2-dev uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:39:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 20030314
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
>Category: ada
>Synopsis: [3.3 regression] ada bootstrap error on mipsel-linux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Release:3.3 branch CVS 20030301
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 184775 gcc-snapshot
Bug#184775: gcc-snapshort: doesn't build on mips
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-snapshort' to `gcc-snapshot'.
> Thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 184800 [fixed in 3.3] ICE while building mplayer
Bug#184800: gcc-3.2: ICE while building mplayer
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 178909 [fixed in 3.3] sparc regression, ICE when optimizing
> (mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:7903)
Bug#178909: g
Please recheck with the current gcc-snapshot package, if the code
example works ok.
If the problem persists, please post a test case (maybe preprocessed
source), not just an excerpt from the source file.
Thanks, Matthias
21 matches
Mail list logo
