On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 05:49:01PM +0100, Luca Andreucci wrote:
>
> this seems to be the lines from the Makefile which cause error
>
> COMPILER_VERSION := $(shell $(CC) --version)
> IS_GCC_30 := $(shell if echo $(COMPILER_VERSION) | $(GREP) -q '^3\.0'; then
> echo yes; else echo no; fi)
>
> I a
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 16 10:12:05 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6
Severity: important
Using libstdc++5 on a 386 CPU may cause Illegal instruction (SIGILL).
Starting program: /usr/bin/python2.2
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 297)]
0x400d1b7f in std::locale::_Impl::_
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Those operations are atomic for any number of CPUs, so you're looking
> in the wrong place.
Ok, I take Your word for it :-), and I will try to look around ones
again to see if I can locate the problem somewhere else. And I will then
try to ex
Hi Randolph,
>>
>>> I am looking to rebuild gcc-3.3 64bits to rebuild the last kernel 2.4
>to
>>> conitnue my investigation about smp(64bits) [which failled to boot on
>a
>>N4000
>>> when compile d with gcc-3.2 get from unofficial-debs].
>>
>>If you are working on 64-bit, I would advise staying w
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:37:30PM +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:32, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Is this your own installation of GCC 3.2? Our
> > i386-linux/bits/atomicity.h contains the atomic operations, not a
> > single-threaded version.
> No, it is not, it
this seems to be the lines from the Makefile which cause error
COMPILER_VERSION := $(shell $(CC) --version)
IS_GCC_30 := $(shell if echo $(COMPILER_VERSION) | $(GREP) -q '^3\.0'; then
echo yes; else echo no; fi)
I am in a GREAT hurry and can't provide further detail for now... sorry
--
o
Package: g++-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre5
Severity: important
The following program is valid C++, but does not compile:
-- snip --
class X {
public:
template
int bar () {return d;}
};
template
int fooo ()
{
return x;
}
template
void bar (T& g)
{
int kk = fooo<17>(); // OK
X x;
int k
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: [linux-mips]: ICE while building libstdc++
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Release:gcc-ss-20030317
>Environment:
linux
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [CC ing the other GCC people as well, not debian-gcc, as this started
> with private mails. Feel free to move it's over there]
Moved to -gcc. Happy fun multi-posting!
> Randolph Chung writes:
> > tbh hppa would benefit from going
10 matches
Mail list logo
