Bug#177840: [Bug optimization/9812] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148

2003-06-30 Thread wilson at tuliptree dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 --- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2003-06-30 06:30 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148 I googled

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #196090 to gcc-gnats as PR 11366

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #196090 to gcc-gnats as PR 11366 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11366 forwarded 196090 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11366 Bug#196090: gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2 Bug#196554:

Processed: Re: Bug#197674: g++-3.3: ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 197674 [fixed in 3.4] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template Bug#197674: g++-3.3: ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template Changed Bug title. tags 197674 + upstream Bug#197674: [fixed in 3.4] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template There were no tags

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #198269 to gcc-gnats as PR 11368

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #198269 to gcc-gnats as PR 11368 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11368 forwarded 198269 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11368 Bug#198269: gcc-3.3: -falign-* has no effect on i386 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #197504 to gcc-gnats as PR 11369

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #197504 to gcc-gnats as PR 11369 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11369 forwarded 197504 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11369 Bug#197504: gcc-3.3: too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#197375: marked as done (gcj dies when parsing java code with high ASCII values in it)

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:43:59 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#197375: gcj dies en parsing java code with high ASCII values in it has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #196600 to gcc-gnats as PR 11370

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #196600 to gcc-gnats as PR 11370 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370 forwarded 196600 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11370 Bug#196600: gcc -Wunreachable-code gives false complaints Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #195834 to gcc-gnats as PR 11371

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #195834 to gcc-gnats as PR 11371 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11371 forwarded 195834 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11371 Bug#195834: gcc: bogus warning and/or mis-optimization on ia64 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

[Bug c/11370] [3.3/3.4 Regression] -Wunreachable-code gives false complaints

2003-06-30 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/11371] bogus warning and/or mis-optimization on ia64

2003-06-30 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11371 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

xfree86 miscompilation

2003-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Built the 4.3 sources found at deb-src http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/xfree86/ ./ with gcc-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0 -O2 on i386. I'm unable to reproduce the recent miscompilation (still seeing this with the current soruces from unstable). Seems something is fixed in xfree86 or something isn't

gcc-3.3_3.3.1ds0-0pre0_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2003-06-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb fastjar_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb fixincludes_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb g++-3.3_3.3.1-0pre0_m68k.deb

Results for 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 26 05:24:39 UTC 2003 Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6) FAIL: g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C (test for excess errors)

[Bug optimization/11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC

2003-06-30 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added