PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12564
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2003-10-15
02:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: deprecate -V or update documentation
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:38:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug #94955 reported against g++-2.95
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:51:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report, unreproducible with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-14
19:42 ---
Might have gotten fixed by:
Subject: Bug 11087
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:g
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12576
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
19:36 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompilation of ide-scsi linux kernel driver
pinskia at
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215716: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200670: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#150357: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-18_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-18_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
to
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
18:26 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare
pinskia at g
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
17:56 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175
pinskia at gcc dot
-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus)
Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file INSTALLER97.exe
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:BAN Nobuhiro
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [3.3/3.4] ICE on initializer with an array index
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: ice-on-illegal-code
>Release: 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian p
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package: gcc-2.95
Severity: serious
Version: 2.95.4.ds14-17
Since there is no longer any libgc6-dev package in unstable, it is now
impossible to build gcc-2.95 (at least without passing -d to
dpkg-buildpackage).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Li
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-14
06:51 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling
genconst
16 matches
Mail list logo