[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-22 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-22 Thread Thomas Nemeth
Le 22.10.03, Matthias Klose a tapoté : | Thomas, please could you recheck with gcc-3.3.2-1 from unstable? julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310221207.log Inst gcc-3.3 [1:3.3.2-0pre5] (1:3.3.2-1 Debian:unstable) julie[gacc] gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.2/specs Configured

Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-22 Thread Thomas Nemeth
Le 22.10.03, Ben Collins a tapoté : | This is a bug in the code. Too much allocation on the stack: | | int read_infos (int socket_data, char **infos) { | int nb; | char datas[SSIZE_MAX]; | | /* SSIZE_MAX = 2147483647 */ | | That's 2 gigs of stack allocation...not likely to happen :)

Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-22 Thread Ben Collins
| this overflow of stack in assembly: | | read_infos: | .LLFB46: | .loc 1 197 0 | !#PROLOGUE# 0 | save%sp, --2147483544, %sp | | Notice the double negative, produces by overflowing the stack pointer, I'm not very familiar with compilers internals but (I once made

Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error

2003-10-22 Thread Thomas Nemeth
Le 22.10.03, Ben Collins a tapoté : | I'm not very familiar with compilers internals but (I once made | a code-generator, that's all) but how can a double negative can | happen ? | | It is basically this: | | fprintf(asm_file, \tsave\t%sp, -%d, %sp\n, size_of_stack); | | So

Bug#217075: -Wformat option ignored in g++-3.3?

2003-10-22 Thread Egon Eckert
Package: g++-3.3 Version: 3.3.2-1 Severity: normal I'm confused about the -Wformat behaviour in newer g++ 3.3 releases. It works for plain C, but seems to be ignored for C++ (in some cases at least). Look at this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat testik.cc #include stdio.h int main() { printf(%d\n,

Bug#194345: [edi@gmx.de: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package]

2003-10-22 Thread Eduard Bloch
Forgotten copy; the file is stored on http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/sshfs-breaks-with-g++-3.3.tgz - Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:28:47 +0200 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package To:

[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-22 15:27 --- Subject: Bug 10110 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by:

[Bug libstdc++/8610] large file support in libstdc++-v3 (std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96)

2003-10-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610 --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-22 15:52 --- Subject: Bug 8610 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL

[Bug libstdc++/8610] large file support in libstdc++-v3 (std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96)

2003-10-22 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610 paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added