Ah, distinctly I remember, it was in the bleak December,
Hõpe to have a bìgger pènis ?
Wè hãve the stùff the pornstãr use to have bìgger
pènis, contrõl their orgãsm and boõst their èrection
Ordèr Hère
http://turantech.com/?xc55059t&banner
That I scarce was sure I heard you." Here I opened wide
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 19 08:54:38 UTC 2004
Native configuration is mipsel-linux (repeat.rfc822.org)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: adam3i.pas
FAIL: adam3j.pas
FAIL: adam3o.pas
FAIL: adam3p.pas
FAIL: assumptions.pas
FAIL: binrdwt.pas
FAIL: bitfields.pas
FAIL: chris4.p
Package: lib64gcc1
Version: 3.4.1-7
Severity: normal
lib64gcc1 (which is of priority required) depends on amd64-libs, which
is optional. This does not make much sense.
$ apt-cache show lib64gcc1
Package: lib64gcc1
Priority: required
Section: libs
Architecture: i386
Source: gcc-3.4 (3.4.1ds1-7)
Ve
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:27:17PM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:44:03AM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> >> No warning, but the generated code seems incorrect (or at least a
> >> regression from 3.3) unless ((int *)&v
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:44:03AM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
>> No warning, but the generated code seems incorrect (or at least a
>> regression from 3.3) unless ((int *)&val)[x] isn't the correct
>> portable way to access a vector element, but th
Hello Betts,
Fantastic, huh? Take a look in your 128 bit secure site
Hope to see you soon.
Sheila
http://www.a-z-meds.com/book/
There if you don’t care
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBJu5KmqjQ0CJ
Hi,
I'm new to the list so if I'm off topic please let me know...
I' m using Debian woody and I need to recompile g77 (or the gcc package)
and use it to compile a program that needs a little modification in the
g77 source, to compile properly.
I've tried to apt-get both g77 and gcc with the comma
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:44:03AM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> No warning, but the generated code seems incorrect (or at least a
> regression from 3.3) unless ((int *)&val)[x] isn't the correct
> portable way to access a vector element, but there doesn't seem to be
> an alternative that I've be
It contains the exact same ingredients as regular viaggra, except that you
pay much, much less.
All pills are produced in world-class licensed facilities only.
Pay for your order using any major credit card.
Mallory Dinges
http://Jmexmxbper.discountgenericviagra.com?Mvgmh/Yscfncvsa
This i
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.1-4sarge1
Severity: normal
I'm compiling the following code example under both gcc 3.3.4-2 and
3.4.1-4sarge1:
#include
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((mode(V4SI)));
static void
print_v4si (const char * name, v4si val)
{
int x;
10 matches
Mail list logo