Bug#341788: libg2c0-dev: includes 32-bit compatibility libraries in pure 64-bit amd64 installation

2005-12-03 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 341788 minor merge 341788 323285 tags 341788 + wontfix thanks Larry Doolittle writes: Package: libg2c0-dev Version: 1:3.4.5-1 Severity: normal Out of the 905 packages on my pure 64-bit amd64 debian sid machine, only this one and fakeroot put any files in /emul/ia32-linux/ . For

Processed: Re: Bug#341788: libg2c0-dev: includes 32-bit compatibility libraries in pure 64-bit amd64 installation

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 341788 minor Bug#341788: libg2c0-dev: includes 32-bit compatibility libraries in pure 64-bit amd64 installation Severity set to `minor'. merge 341788 323285 Bug#323285: /usr/lib64 should be in a separate package Bug#341788: libg2c0-dev:

Bug#323512: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find libstdc++.a.2.10.0)

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#326506: marked as done (gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] reorg.c:384: error: invalid lvalue in increment)

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#336057: marked as done (gcc-2.95: FTBFS [arm] gcc/config/arm/arm.c:556: error: invalid lvalue in assignment)

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This bug was fixed in 2.95.4.ds15-23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341816: [arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands

2005-12-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: binutils,gcj-4.0 Version: 2.16.1cvs20051117-1 Severity: serious the gcc-4.0 build from Nov 18 using binutils-2.16.1 did succeed, today's gcj-4.0 fails: /build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcj-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/ -B/usr/arm-linux-gnu/bin/

Bug#317475: marked as done ([m68k] ICE: Segmentation fault)

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 08:27:34 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Re: i want bigger and longer and thikker pennis!

2005-12-03 Thread Airou
hello, i have a big troubleof my small and echoue pennis'it looks like a banana'as u know that make always thinking a bout that and sad every time i see my pennis,and i shy when i meet women orto show my pennis .so please help me out of it, i'll appreaciate any reply from you i'll still

Bug#341877: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc'

2005-12-03 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-3.4 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. if [ x`case '-O2 -g -O2 -m64 -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-implicit-templates -m64' in *-fpic* ) echo -fpic ;; * ) echo

Bug#341877: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc'

2005-12-03 Thread Matthias Klose
block 341877 with 340835 thanks Blars Blarson writes: Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-3.4 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. so do you want to report that for _every_ package that builds

Processed: Re: Bug#341877: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc'

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: block 341877 with 340835 Bug#341877: gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc' Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 340835 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.changes

2005-12-03 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb libstdc++6-dev_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb libstdc++6-pic_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please enable tri-arch support for the MIPS platforms. The attached patch (and a corresponding patch to glibc) provide support for n32 n64 ABIs in addition to the current o32 ABI. These patches have been tested by building n32

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Stuart Anderson writes: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please enable tri-arch support for the MIPS platforms. The attached patch (and a corresponding patch to glibc) provide support for n32 n64 ABIs in addition to the current o32 ABI. These patches

gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2005-12-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb g77-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb gcc-3.4-base_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb to

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:31:23PM -0700, Stuart Anderson wrote: +# DP: Description: add full tri-arch support. Include linux64.h also fix up +# DP: Description: the directory names so that o32 is the default and follow +# DP: Description: the glibc convention for 32 64 bit names Everyone

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on a specific patch level of yet another

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on a specific

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:51:32AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:51:32AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug,