Hello
Do you have some news about this gnu_dev_minor problem with gcc 4.3
Thanks
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
If this is right, I do not really see the advantage to divertion with
respect to conflicting packages.
The idea on divert libgcc is for cross toolchains. I work on an
i386/amd64 machine and i have many ARM targets, let's say i have
processors which requires floating point emulated by software
Hi,
Hector Oron wrote:
If this is right, I do not really see the advantage to divertion with
respect to conflicting packages.
The idea on divert libgcc is for cross toolchains. I work on an
i386/amd64 machine and i have many ARM targets, let's say i have
processors which requires
Hello Vincent,
That said, I have absolutely no idea if it is possible or not to allow
the user to choose its cross toolchain (but I'm sure that this would be
more difficult to implement than your proposition).
Yes, that is going to be very hard to do, let's think about it.
Coding gcc's debian
Selon Hector Oron:
Hello Vincent,
That said, I have absolutely no idea if it is possible or not to
allow the user to choose its cross toolchain (but I'm sure that this
would be more difficult to implement than your proposition).
Yes, that is going to be very hard to do, let's think about
5 matches
Mail list logo
