Hi,
On 10/12/23 19:14, Simon Richter wrote:
I cannot reproduce this, and I would rather not investigate time into
that. Please check if you see this with gcc-13 as well.
I suspect it's a missing dependency, so the failure is more dependent on
"number of threads", and that it succeeds for -b
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-12.3.0 revision
8fc1a49c9312b05d925b7d21f1d2145d70818151
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is
On 2023-10-12 2:09 a.m., Matthias Klose wrote:
On 07.10.23 21:43, John David Anglin wrote:
This problem seems to have disappeared. Last build of gcc-13 and last couple of
builds of gcc-snapshot
have been successful.
yes, that because of a local patch:
Hi,
On 10/12/23 15:17, Matthias Klose wrote:
I cannot reproduce this, and I would rather not investigate time into
that. Please check if you see this with gcc-13 as well.
I suspect it's a missing dependency, so the failure is more dependent on
"number of threads", and that it succeeds for
Package: gcc-12
Version: 12.3.0-10
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: andre.nauj...@keysight.com
Hello.
The following piece of code generates a compiler error with gcc-12 in C++20
mode:
template
struct F {
static double foo() { return D; }
};
template
struct F {
static double
I cannot reproduce this, and I would rather not investigate time into that.
Please check if you see this with gcc-13 as well.
On 06.10.23 09:49, Simon Richter wrote:
Package: gcc-12
Version: 12.3.0-9
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org
Hi,
I just built arch:all and
On 07.10.23 21:43, John David Anglin wrote:
This problem seems to have disappeared. Last build of gcc-13 and last couple of
builds of gcc-snapshot
have been successful.
yes, that because of a local patch:
7 matches
Mail list logo
