Hello,
#915934 can be related. Please forward to GCC.
Anton
Am Di., 11. Dez. 2018 um 19:54 Uhr schrieb Filippo Rusconi :
>
> Package: libeigen3-dev
> Version: 3.3.5-2
> Severity: serious
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> when building libpwiz on the arm64, armel, mips architectu
tags 840889 +pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 20161011-1.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/10.
Please fell free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule. Diff is attached.
Best regards
Anton
diff -Nru libiberty-20161011/debian/changelog
be attached in the next mail.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840360#19
Thanks,
Anton
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 01:01 +0100, jnqnfe wrote:
> it's actually just a couple of libreoffice dependencies specifically
> targeting 1.55 that are causing the hold up in upgrade installation
> currently (at least here on my systems).
No it seems to be much more... evolution (indirectly) depends on i
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 00:35 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> this is unfortunate, however there never was and is any commitment of
> unstable
> getting security fixes.
Sure, however reality is probably, that many people actually run
unstable as their stable systems - I woudln't be surprised if this i
Package: gcc-4.8
Version: 4.8.0-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
last update of gcc causes FTBFS (in this case, yade package):
/tmp/ccNQ6K5n.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccNQ6K5n.s:420: Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'
I think it is a compiler`s issue.
Thanks,
Package: libstdc++6-4.6-dbg
Version: 4.6.2-7
Severity: normal
Hi.
Since some time ldconfig always complains about:
ldconfig: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py is not an ELF
file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start.
Any idea?
Cheers,
Chris.
-- System Information:
D
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 22:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Well, the issue raised in LKML is that you absolutely should *not* enable
> -fstack-protector-all unless you _really_ know what you're doing, and most
> certainly not by default. It has nothing to do with -fstack-protector, ju
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Any idea if these patches will be merged upstream?
It's probably quite unlikely,... although I never understood why,..
Even though it's available for some architectures,.. it would improve
security at least on them.
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi.
Ever thought about integrating PaX [0] per default in Debian?
I'm however not sure how much this actually breaks ;)
Cheers,
Chris.
[0] http://pax.grsecurity.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Our company is looking for energetic and accountable individuals to occupy
Shipping Clerk positions throughout the USA. These vacancies are entirely
home-based and do not require any travel or relocation. They are also
suitable for students and senior citizens who are able to dedicate up
> provided that we have a 64bit glibc, which, according to the glibc
> maintainers, doesn't work with the current glibc sources in Debian.
Thanks for the update. I'll work on the glibc guys, we had opposition
last time we asked but we can now use the amd64 merge as an example.
Anton
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.1-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
I noticed x86/x86-64 now has a biarch compiler. It would be great if ppc
did as well, its one of the last missing pieces we need for decent ppc64
support.
FYI binutils has been biarch on ppc for a year or so, so gcc should just
work.
-- Sys
13 matches
Mail list logo
