Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| These are results from the current Debian builds (slightly differing
| from the gcc-3.3.4 prerelease tarball), compared to the Debian build
| of the gcc-3.3.3 release.
Thanks for your report.
Do you know in which ways they differ?
| - s390-linux shows
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Module name:gcc
| Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 02:42:17
|
| Modified files:
| gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c
| gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
| Added files:
| gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt: inline6.C
|
Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| In reference to a message from Matthias Klose, dated Apr 05:
| Will do. What about applying this patch upstream for 3.2.3?
|
| since this is not a regression, i'm not sure it will be a candidate for
| 3.2.3, but if Gabriel is ok with it, all the better
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| template typename T, int role, bool ndebug
| struct init {
| static T * do_it() {
| T* tmp(new T);
| std::cout /tmp/ point to: *tmp \n;
| return tmp;
| }
| };
| /tmp/ point to: 0
| /tmp/ point to: 1075812784
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The code below does not compile with g++ 3.0, but it seems correct
| judging by my C++ books.
No serious up-to-date C++ book can claim the code below should work.
| listauto_ptrint lapi;
That is incorrect: You cannot put an auto_ptr in a standard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++
Programming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7
(Grammar/Declarations) defines the using directive:
| using-declaration:
| using typename(opt) ::(opt)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++ Pro
| gramming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7
(Grammar/Declara
| tions) defines the using directive:
| | using-declaration:
| |
7 matches
Mail list logo
