Bug#204600: cannot reproduce

2003-08-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I tried to check but cannot reproduce your problem. I can install gcc-3.3 fine. First of all, could you check if you have disk failures ? (dmesg, etc.) Maybe your file system ? (I am using ext3) Dunno. regards, junichi

Re: locales in buildd environment (http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2003/debian-gcc-200301/msg00060.html)

2003-01-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
I couldn't find any reference to LOCPATH either, but setlocale seems to look at directories specified by LOCPATH in addition to (or instead of) the standard location (/usr/lib/locale) ok, next question is how to write the new definitions to the new LOCPATH. the outputdir in localedef

Re: locales in buildd environment (http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2003/debian-gcc-200301/msg00060.html)

2003-01-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, To ensure some locales are available, I think you can use LOCPATH, and create locales locally, so that the following are available: de_DE ISO-8859-1 en_US ISO-8859-1 fr_FR ISO-8859-1 see /usr/sbin/locale-gen on how to generate these locale data. regards, junichi

Re: locales in buildd environment (http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2003/debian-gcc-200301/msg00060.html)

2003-01-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
To ensure some locales are available, I think you can use LOCPATH, and create locales locally, so that the following are available: de_DE ISO-8859-1 en_US ISO-8859-1 fr_FR ISO-8859-1 see /usr/sbin/locale-gen on how to generate these locale data. ok, it's no problem to

Bug#173290: gcj package does not provide gcj-wrapper-3.0

2002-12-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 Severity: grave /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-3.0 is missing from gcj-3.0, which update-alternative points to. Packages which build-depend on gcj will pull in gcj-3.0, which is broken, which breaks build. regards, junichi

Re: 3.2 transition

2002-12-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On the FAQ: Why don't we put the libs in a different directory? Basically, it's too complex. For the glibc transition, we could do this because they used different dynamic linkers. For this transition, there is also little to gain in having full backwards compatibility to the old ABI. The

Bug#172878: FTBFS: Build failure of gcc-3.0 on i386

2002-12-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.4ds3-13 Severity: serious gcc-3.0 fails to build from source on i386, when doing a rebuild inside chroot. I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your package from source in the current sid distribution. It is a serious problem that your source

Re: Bug#169223: pbuilder: Can't handle Build-Conflicts: mawk

2002-11-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
At 15 Nov 2002 06:16:38 -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: pbuilder Version: 0.48 Severity: normal This error happens trying to use pbuilder to build gcc-3.0: Ermm... is this really a good idea to go around randomly removing essential packages from build machines through specifying

Bug#165180: gij-3.0 does not depend on libgcc1 (libgcc_s.so.1) which is required for its operation.

2002-10-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: gij-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 dh_testdir /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/ttthreeparser-1.4' Translating TTCN3Lexer.g /usr/bin/gij-3.0: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[1]: ***

Bug#158459: gcc-3.2: FTBFS as non-root

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:14:30 +0200 Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/LB/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/gcc/ada \ /usr/bin/make -C /tmp/LB/gcc-3.2-3.2ds0/build/gcc gnatlib gnattools It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} -- [EMAIL

Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On 27 Aug 2002 13:03:15 +0100 Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} Even better, something like LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. It's generally not desirable to introduce null path

Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On 27 Aug 2002 13:03:15 +0100 Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} Even better, something like LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. It's generally not desirable to introduce null path

Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:36:09 -0400 Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} Even better, something like LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. It's generally not desirable to introduce null

Re: FWD: C++ library packaging

2002-06-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa
/lib. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4 Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#143701: gij-3.0: won't install -- conflict with apt-localepurge?

2002-04-19 Thread Junichi Uekawa
0.0.34 Automagically removing unnecessary locale data -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4 Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide

Bug#139796: gij-3.0: fails to configure when localepurge has removed ja man pages

2002-03-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
happens with this package, I suspect it's a problem with gij in particular, not update-alternatives or localepurge. This is more of a wishlist, and a bug in localepurge, isn't it ? Packages aren't expected to work when random files are removed. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http

Bug#136351: gcc-3.0: missing alternatives?

2002-03-02 Thread Junichi Uekawa
this bug as fixed, but as should not be fixed. Actually this does meet exactly the idea of wontfix, doesn't it? pentium-builder implements exactly this, and in a better way, even. This bug doesn't really have much value. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http

Bug#119064: gcc-3.0: gcc should be a `Provides'

2002-02-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

Bug#119064: gcc-3.0: gcc should be a `Provides'

2002-02-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Stuart Rowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit: gcc is provided by gcc-defaults, not gcc-2.95 regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4