On Nov 12, 2011, at 15:56, Anthony Green wrote:
> On 11/1/2011 4:55 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> On Nov 01, 2011, at 11:53, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>> Please consider applying.
>
> I like this patch, and have applied it after a minor tweak (cache
> cif->rtype->size
Hello,
The fix for GCC PR target/50906 has now been applied to gcc-4_6-branch,
so it should hopefully soon be automatically picked up in the Debian GCC
sources from that branch.
For reference, the commit log is attached below.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
On Dec 05, 2011, at 22:47, amodra at gcc dot gn
On Nov 02, 2011, at 17:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 04:09 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
>> on "powerpcspe" with that patch. It turns out gcj needs to build
>> a
Hello,
I have verified that gcc-4.6 and gcj-4.6 both build successfully
on "powerpcspe" with that patch. It turns out gcj needs to build
an embedded copy of libffi (is that OK under Debian policy?), so
I also had to apply the new libffi patch in #647288 [1].
This patch modifies a case conditiona
On Nov 01, 2011, at 11:53, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> After upgrading to a new version of GNU ld for PowerPC e500, I started
> seeing build errors on e500 systems again. It turns out that the
> PowerPC "string instructions" are unimplemented on PPC440 and most other
> embedded cores, and also cause une
Matthias,
On Oct 27, 2011, at 06:56, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So, r5655 did break these builds. Reverted the patch again, and checked in a
> fix
> which doesn't break the native builds. Could you verify that it still fixes
> the
> cross cases?
It seems to be OK right now, thanks for your help
Hi Matthias!
On Oct 12, 2011, at 12:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 12:12 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Package: libffi
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: patch upstream
>> User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
>> Usertags: powerpcspe
>>
>> The Debian-Ports "powerpcspe" architecture can't curren
On Oct 12, 2011, at 12:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 12:12 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Package: libffi
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: patch upstream
>> User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
>> Usertags: powerpcspe
>>
>> The Debian-Ports "powerpcspe" architecture can't currently build the
On Oct 11, 2011, at 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 10:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Source: gcc-4.6
>> Version: 4.6.1-15
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> When building in REVERSE_CROSS mode (IE: when trying to build a native
>> compiler for another architecture with an existing cross-comp
Hi Matthias,
On Oct 11, 2011, at 14:24, Matthias Klose wrote:
> why use graphite at all for the stage1 build?
Well, this isn't really the stage1 build of GCC. When bootstrapping an
architecture I want to avoid rebuilding packages as much as possible,
which means that I want a "final-stage" GCC t
On Oct 08, 2011, at 17:20, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Oct 08, 2011, at 14:47, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> On Oct 08, 2011, at 08:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> except that it does break the native build :-/ pretty please test cross
>>> patches
>>> with a native build too.
>>>
>>> with_libgcc is unset wit
reassign 644764 gcc-defaults 1.107
fixed 644764 1.108
close 644764
thanks
On Oct 10, 2011, at 13:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 07:52 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> This build failure is for a native build of
>> an amd64 "gcc-4.6" on an amd64 system (See the
Matthias,
On Oct 10, 2011, at 04:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 08:49 PM, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> I don't see this. is /usr/include/asm a symlink? is gcc-multilib the recent
>>> version in unstable? If this is a local b
Hi Matthias! Thanks for your help!
On Oct 09, 2011, at 04:47, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 10:31 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Source: gcc-4.6
>> Version: 4.6.1-13
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
>> past)
>>
>> When trying t
On Oct 08, 2011, at 14:47, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Oct 08, 2011, at 08:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>> except that it does break the native build :-/ pretty please test cross
>> patches
>> with a native build too.
>>
>> with_libgcc is unset with this patch. the stage stuff should go after setti
Hi!
On Oct 08, 2011, at 08:36, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 01:30 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 07.10.2011 11:48, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
When compiling a GCC stage1 cross-compiler, the generated control file
depends on "libgcc" even when one is not built, making it
rom: "Moffett, Kyle D"
> Date: October 04, 2011 18:12:27 EDT
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: libffi: Build errors on PowerPC e500, test-suite failures on PowerPC
> soft-float
>
> Package: libffi
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch upstream
> User: de
reopen 579780
thanks
On 2010/05/18 12:45, "Debian Bug Tracking System"
wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the gcc-4.4 package:
>
> #579780: powerpcspe: Preliminary architecture port and minor bugfix
>
> It has been closed by Matthias K
On 2010/05/18 16:49, "Matthias Klose" wrote:
> On 18.05.2010 20:41, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> On 2010/05/17 09:28, "Matthias Klose" wrote:
>>> On 30.04.2010 19:51, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>>> Package: gcc-4.4
>>>> Version: 4.4.2-9
&g
On 2010/05/17 09:28, "Matthias Klose" wrote:
> On 30.04.2010 19:51, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> Package: gcc-4.4
>> Version: 4.4.2-9
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: patch sid
>>
>> If "CC" is left unset, it defaults to "cc" and causes the compiler to
>> be built to run on the build system instead of on
On 2010/04/30 14:53, "Kyle D Moffett" wrote:
> On 2010/04/30 14:18, "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior"
> wrote:
>> I think you don't have to write the complete history each time. You
>> could write "new port" followed by a link to wiki page which has some
>> more informations.
>
> Good point; I'll make
21 matches
Mail list logo
