now in -16.
Good. Can confirm. You can close the bug.
Regards,
Rene
ase was 3 weeks before that. So this "no test rebuild for bullseye"
is not true.
Regards
Rene
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
c++6. Neither LO nor the
>>> test are an executable it's a executable with gazillions of .sos.
>>
>> I meant running the generated program (smoketest) without rebuilding
>> it:
>>
>> 1. Build smoketest with the old g++-9 / libstdc++6.
>> 2. Upgrade g++-9 / libstd
tdc++6.
In testing against 6.3.2 there:
== Starting smoketest with 1 job against
path:/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice ==
S=/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice/libreoffice-6.3.2.2 &&
I=/usr/lib/libreoffice && W=$S/workdir && touch
$W/Headers/Cp
hat would need to copy the longish command from the old log, but yeah.
>(I assume that the smoketest executable does not invoke g++-9 to
>rebuild things on the fly.)
No, but make check in smokest might rebuild stuff. That was what I was aiming
at. This already happens in "normal" builds.
Regards
Rene
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
nor the test are an executable it's a executable with
gazillions of .sos.
Regards
Rene
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
n testing,
debian/tests/smoketest, dist-upgrade to did and rerun it and hope some makefile
magic doesn't trigger some rebuild...
The smokest (except the cppunit blurb) just does "run lo, open
smoketestdoc.sxw, run some macros to test basic stuff".
Will try...
Regards
Rene
--
D
tree. You need to actually build the test libs etc to run it.
That is why autopkgtest does only smoketest instead of all c++ unit tests even
though the latter would be helpful.
Tried to decouple it once but failed as it always either wanted something
present it write in the "instdir&qu
I'm not interested in a bts war, which rene
> likes to start very often. and, no, I won't start citing rene's private
> messages here.
You imply they were bad. I can cite them myself if you want. There wasn't bad
messages, it was basically the same which was in the bug but in german.
You like
on all
> > sides,
>
> yes, and side note that I will use the same terms of "several days ago" for
> a three day silence including two non-work days.
>
> > but let's try to work together to fix the current situation.
>
> my moreinfo tag was removed, and I'm
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:17:49PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Rene, I really appreciate the fact that libreoffice has an extensive
> test suite. But just to get options on the table can you please tell us
> how severe this particular failure is? In other words, how much is this
>
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:48:45PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > or adding information what is going wrong?
>
> See above. apt-get build-dep libreoffice, install the test
> depenencies of smoketest, debian/tests/smoketest in the chroot.
Or just build libreoffice as is in
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:45:27PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 25.10.19 18:33, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > And since then I also can just reproduce it in a chroot, too.
>
> You didn't say that before.
I did in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > [...] -12 was uploaded on Oct 23, but you say
> > that the tests started failing on Oct 21.
>
> No, the submitter did which clearly w
/unstable/amd64/libr/libreoffice/3241554/log.gz
And since then I also can just reproduce it in a chroot, too.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
> >
> > no. based on what rationale?
And to prevent said gcc-9 version from migrating, to not break something
else (no
reassign 943401 libstdc++6
thanks
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:53:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:libreoffice
>
> On 25.10.19 17:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > reassign 943401 libstdc++6
> > found 943401 9.2.1-12
> > thanks
> >
>
t; > some other debugging help...)
>
> gcc-9 9.2.1-9 (r276687) was uploaded on Oct 10, the next version built in
> the archive was 9.2.1-12 (r277294), built on Oct 23. Fyi, I see these issues
> in Ubuntu focal as well.
OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
Regards,
Rene
retitle 943401 C++ Unit tests failing (Failure instantiating protector
"/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice/libreoffice-6.3.3.1/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/unoexceptionprotector.so",
"unoexceptionprotector")
severity 943401 serious
tag 943401 + sid
tag 94340
al"
std::stack usage? But I assume you file it here because it only happens
with cppunit?
> It suffices to rebuild the package by compiling it with g++-9 and the segfault
> does not occur any more.
Strictly speaking this would be a bug (or some known change?) in
gcc/libstdc++6 then?
Regards,
Rene
ile in 1:10.1.29-3 as a temporary
> measure.
Obviously you didn't try it yourself... Because that doesn't work. Still
happens.
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mariadb-10.1=arm64=1%3A10.1.29-3=1511381757=0
Regards,
Rene
reassign 823145 src:libreoffice
retitle 823145 FTBFS with gcc 6: -isystem /usr/include in KDE4_CFLAGS breaks
includes
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 01:23:32PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Jup. See "checking for KDE4 headers... /usr/include". Which ends up as
>
>
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 01:05:47PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > By the way, is there any particular reason why LibreOffice buildsystem uses
> > -isystem /usr/include?
>
> Probably some bug where it just adds whatever -I it finds (and be it
> /usr/include, which sho
ere it just adds whatever -I it finds (and be it
/usr/include, which shouldn't be specificied but..) and then turns that into
a -isystem...
Or are you implying it does work without that -isystem?
(cowbuilder-unstable)rene@frodo:~$ g++-6 -isystem /usr/include -c test.c
In file included
0a1414c29cfc47068165a599c
(actually in 5.2.x the whole thing is gone.) but there definitely are more.
See https://whatofhow.wordpress.com/2016/01/20/gcc-6/.
And when trying it on 5.1.x I get a ICE :/
(actually Stephans post above says two ICEs, one of them can be worked around
in LO, the other
idea whether cython is fixed and/or a bin-NMU works, but it's not
a libstdc++6 bug.
Regards,
Rene
for a few hours...
Anyway, 4.4.5-1 has FTBFS problems, so I need a 4.4.5-2 (which I need in any
case, othweise rebuilds will fail in any case. bad.).
Pleae update the Breaks to libreoffice = 1:4.4.5-2
(OK, that doesn't take into account the 5.0.0 rcs in experimental, but oh
well..)
Regards,
Rene
(= 4.7.0-1) depends on one of:
- libgcj-bc (= 4.7.0-3)
libgcj-bc (= 4.7.0-3) depends on missing:
- libgcj10 (= 4.7.0-1~)
and thus blocks any Java-related package build on kfreebsd-*.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
it formulated in your unpolite mail at least.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120226202859.gj17...@rene-engelhard.de
of humour, eh?
If the bug is formulated like the nonsense in this post I won't believe so.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120225140424
for other features. amd64
bugs in the bridges e.g. also affected calc computation back in the
past...)
I've pointed that one out already on #debian-arm...
For the why do you need mingw-w64? part, Stephen already answered it
correctly.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
@@
+gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-11.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Rene Engelhard ]
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add patch for PR c++/50442, reverting fix for PR c++/49267
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:57:52 +0200
+
gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
* Update to SVN
library for use with
libgcj-bc recommends no packages.
libgcj-bc suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011063921.ga21...@rene-engelhard.de
...@rene-engelhard.de
-jre will not force you anything,
gij,gcj etc. can still point to anything, gcj-4.4-jre just brings you an
empty package which brings you gcj-4.4-jre-headless, which gives you gij-4.4,
gcj-4.4 via it's dependencies, not gij or gcj or whatever your java might
point to.
Rene, could you please confirm
on:
ii libgcj-common 1:4.4.4-1 Java runtime library (common files
ii libgcj10 4.4.4-2Java runtime library for use with
libgcj-bc recommends no packages.
libgcj-bc suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
So the .shlibs adds a dependency on a non-existing version and thus
makes built -gcj packages uninstallable.
Thankfully any upload of gcc-defaults would most probably automagically
fix this, but I'd still prefer it saying
severity 580148 serious
thanks
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 580148 + moreinfo
thanks
Which info do you need
://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/05/msg00013.html
rüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E
=libgcj.specmode=pathsuite=unstablearch=s390
this is part of the package.
Maybe, but apparently gcj doesn't find it...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 580148 + moreinfo
thanks
Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently
running testbuild for an other thing is over
[ @ -sparc/-openoffice: It goes about the repeated and random(!) build
failures and ICEs of OOo on sparc, see buildd.d.o ]
Hi again,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:36:31AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 01:27:09PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
1) Martin, can you please
exactly was removed in -5 from j-g-c-dev to close the bug
you reported.
Matthias, can you please do it quickly? There's loads of packages
FTBFSing because of this bug right now, and it'll even get worse
when they need bin-NMUs for upcoming transitions (like some packages
do)
Regards,
Rene
://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
.../java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.80-2_i386.deb)
...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.80-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/aot-compile', which is also in package
libgcj-common
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
bt)
12:35 @_rene_ doko: ^
12:35 yarodin and all builds has that problem, not only go-oo
12:35 @_rene_ yep
12:35 yarodin infra build too
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r
is a gcc bug which *might* have effect
on other stuff too - so I am reassigning a clone to gcc itself and repening
that clone.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
# seems this was forgotten to be reopened aft
reopen 504323
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
you need, yes... ;-)
BTW; it works for me with 3.0.1 on amd64... Florian, can you confirm?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
notfixed 504323 1:3.0.1~rc1-2
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
BTW; it works for me with 3.0.1 on amd64... Florian, can you confirm?
No, sorry, no idea why it worked before I wrote this, but it actually
doesn't...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
|4.3.0-3 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
And neither is a newer gcj-4.3 uploaded.
Sme for gij and libgcj-bc with libgcj9-0 (= 4.3.0-5).
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT
://bugs.debian.org/478760. Simple to
reproduce: Try to use a Java wizard on OOo on powerpc...
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:44 +0200
So the leftover gdc on sparc should be removed.
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF
It is also useful in alleviating depressed libido, functional impotence and
sexual weakness.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
into NEW first.
Irrelevant.
a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and
therefore
/Regards,
Ren?
--
.''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have
gcj so it's most
likely a gcj problem.
Sorry, not more info available..
Regards,
Rene
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
/home/rene/openoffice.org-2.2.0/ooo-build/build/current/solenv/unxlngx6/lib
-L/home/rene/openoffice.org-2.2.0/ooo-build/build/current/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/lib
-L/home/rene/openoffice.org-2.2.0/ooo-build/build/current/solenv/unxlngx6/lib
-L/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/lib64 -L/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr/lib/jvm/java
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
please add lib64 symlink
why? you should fix the build system to use lib, not lib64.
I disagree. lib64 is a common and normal assumption.
Please add a symlink lib64 - lib, ad one for /lib64 - /lib and
/usr/lib64 - /usr/lib done, too
(--configure):
Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurck
Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: java-gcj-compat-dev
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy
/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so
[...]
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 421301 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 needs update for new gcj-4.1
reassign -1 java-gcj-compat-dev
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
/usr/lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ...
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr
the changelog is just a typo, it mixes -dev and non-dev
up, the script is
in java-gcj-compat).
But I don't know what you want with this, so...
But this bug should be reopened in any case.
Regards,
Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFHBYO+FmQsCSK63MRAkxnAJ4lX
there is no symlink in java-gcj-compat-dev.
After adding the link myself the configure script succeeded.
Please add it :)
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Lînger îrgasms - The longest most intense îrgasms of your life
Rock hàrd åråctions - Åråctions like steel
Increased såxuàl desire - Enhàncåd liáido
Åjàculàte like a pîrï stàr - Strîngår åjàculàtiîn (watch where your aiming)
Multiple îrgàsms - Ñum again and again
Up to 500% more volume -
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hi,
ccache g++-4.0 -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc
-I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxlngppc.pro/inc -I.
-I/home/rene/OpenOffice.org/SRC680_m98/solver/680/unxlngppc.pro/inc/stl
-I/home/rene
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
[...]
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc-linux/bin/
-B/usr/powerpc-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/powerpc-linux/include -isystem
/usr/powerpc-linux/sys
Daniel Burrows wrote:
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
and gcc-3.3 also because of libstdc++5...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=194186msg=6.
So it seems it definitely was fixed or some other thing.
I cannot reproduce that now, too..
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED
-apm-rene #1 Sat May 10 00:47:56 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.2-0.1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3-2 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.3-base
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: important
Running the line with g++ -E gives nothing..
no output at all?
Right.
Regards,
Rene
pgpYax3OnoLvl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: important
Making: ../../../unxlngi4.pro/slo/urp_reader.obj
ccache g++ -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../../inc
-I../../../unx/inc -I../../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I.
-I/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpaket/openoffice.org-1.0.3
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hi,
Compiling OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 with the g++ 3.3 suport patches
(IZ 13400) with g++ 3.3 gives us the following ICE:
http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/oo103gcc3patchesice
OK, a talk on IRC gave some info (thanks
Hi,
during OOo's compilation the following is done:
ccache g++ -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../../inc
-I../../../unx/inc -I../../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I.
-I/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpaket/openoffice.org-1.0.3/build-tree/oo_1.0.3_src/solver/641/unxlngi4.pro/inc
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
pgp8CMBZ1egog.pgp
Description: PGP
The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc 3:3.2.2-0The GNU C compiler.
ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http
84 matches
Mail list logo
