Bug#529513: gcc-4.4:[cross] FTBFS cross-compiler

2009-05-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
). | Hunk #2 succeeded at 209 (offset -5 lines). | patching file src/gcc/unwind-generic.h | Hunk #1 succeeded at 211 (offset -3 lines). | Hunk #2 succeeded at 230 (offset -3 lines). | Patch cross-fixes.diff does not apply (enforce with -f) | make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp] Error 1 -- Stephen R. Marenka

Bug#460244: [m68k] Please switch build-dep from gcj-4.1

2008-01-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.77-2 Severity: important Please switch the m68k build-dep from gcj-4.1 to gcj-4.2 (like most everybody else). Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#451190: [m68k] please change defaults to use gcc-4.2

2007-11-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Stephen R Marenka writes: Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.61 Severity: important Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number of package, notably perl and gnustep-base, now require gcc-4.2

Bug#451190: [m68k] please change defaults to use gcc-4.2

2007-11-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.61 Severity: important Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number of package, notably perl and gnustep-base, now require gcc-4.2. We now have about 400 packages blocked on this. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's

Bug#451190: [m68k] please change defaults to use gcc-4.2

2007-11-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Stephen R Marenka writes: Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.61 Severity: important Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number of package, notably perl and gnustep-base, now require gcc-4.2

Bug#448154: [m68k] Nonrepresentational section on output

2007-10-29 Thread Stephen R Marenka
retry it if you think it's a host/chroot thing gcc-4.2 4.2.2-3 #448154 Still in New, but this bug. gcc-4.3 4.3-20071020experimental Not built. I can build it if necessary. gcc-snapshot 20071020-1 Not built. I can build it if necessary. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R

Bug#448154: [m68k] Nonrepresentational section on output

2007-10-26 Thread Stephen R Marenka
returned 1 exit statue hello.c: void main(void) { printf(Hello world\n); } -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using built-in specs. Target: m68k-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj

Bug#446398: [m68k] Nonrepresentational section on output

2007-10-12 Thread Stephen R Marenka
/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output | collect2: ld returned 1 exit statue hello.c: void main(void) { printf(Hello world\n); } -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using built-in specs. Target: m68k-linux-gnu

Re: gnat-4.1/gcj-4.1 manual builds needed on alpha, arm, m68k, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc

2007-06-10 Thread Stephen R Marenka
with the next uploads anyway). I see the listmasters have straightened this message out. I'm building gcj-4.1 on vivaldi. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#425399: [m68k] ffi_prep_closure redefintion

2007-05-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
.html | | bye, Roman Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#405673: gnat-4.1_4.1.1-19(m68k/unstable/spice): FTBFS on m68k

2007-01-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=gnat-4.1 -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393

2006-10-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
and vtk. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#381022: [m68k] gij fails trivial case

2006-08-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
) |at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7) |at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7) |at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7) |at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run(libgcj.so.7) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#381022: [m68k] gij fails trivial case

2006-08-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
java for m68k. Sorry about the dup. Disabling java takes out a fair amount of packages that we could no longer build. Can you point me to the patch? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test each

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
or we can get you access to m68k hardware if necessary. In the meantime maybe it would be good to have gcc build itself or at least the bootstrap compiler -O0? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We now have about sixteen packages that end up with a segfault or an illegal instruction. I haven't tried recompiling all these to verify that this is the same problem, but I

Bug#378599: [m68k] gcc-4.1 -O2 optimization problem

2006-07-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test each

Bug#359281: [m68k] Error: value out of range

2006-06-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-27 10:35]: torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of track.s: Assembler messages: track.s:10716: Error: value out of range Would it be possible to get

Bug#331150: Bug #331150: [m68k] gcc segfaults with -g -fomit-frame-pointer

2006-06-07 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I'll be. :) -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#370602: [m68k] please make gcc-4.1 default

2006-06-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
). -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: qt4-x11

2006-04-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found. Anyone know whether GCC 4.1 has the same

Bug#359703: [m68k] gcc-4.0_4.0.3-1 ftbfs

2006-03-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
=1143526132file=logas=raw. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#323016: ruby1.9 bug

2006-03-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
The ruby1.9 bug only happens at -O2, so might be considered a separate bug. Shall I close this one and open a new one or continue the report here? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2006-03-06 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more details? Is there a PR? A fix? pr 25514 So far it's only been noted that it fails with gcc-4.1 and a reduced testcase has been added. -- Stephen R. Marenka

Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin

2006-03-06 Thread Stephen R Marenka
by Roman Zippel applied in 4.0.1-9. However, ruby1.9 failed with something that looks the same to me, so I don't know what to think. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.9ver=1.9.0%2B20050921-1arch=m68kstamp=1138785971file=logas=raw -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing

Bug#353618: [m68k] gcc-4.0 segfault building glibc

2006-02-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
: In function | `_start':../sysdeps/m68k/elf/start.S:86: undefined reference to `main' | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

patch for 323016

2006-02-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
} (nil) | (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1409 ]) | (nil))) | pack.c:1974: confused by earlier errors, bailing out Fortunately, it seems fixed in 4.1 (at least as tested against ruby1.9). Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right

Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2005-12-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
-O2 to -O1. Hopefully, I've reduced this enough. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] /* based on variable.c from make_3.80+3.81.b4-1 */ #define NULL 0 #include assert.h struct variable_set { void * table; /* Hash

Bug#333536: Upstream

2005-12-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Filed upstream as gnu pr 25043. Confirmed, fixed in 4.1. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#340874: [m68k] gij-4.0: dies with sigabrt

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 08:05:19PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: with the current state of java on m68k, it seems to be better to disable it. Any opinions? Are you of the opinion that java will take a great deal of work to fix? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing

Bug#340874: [m68k] gij-4.0: dies with sigabrt

2005-11-26 Thread Stephen R Marenka
); } } -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#340293: [PR 24912][m68k] ICE reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
{*68k_extendhisi2} (nil) | (nil)) | gengtype-yacc.c:1738: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#312830: marked as done ([PR 23621] [m68k] gcj-dbtool-4.0 aborts)

2005-11-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: yes, please try to build the gcj database: gcj-dbtool-4.0 -n /tmp/foo.db I misunderstood the bug. It still aborts. Sorry, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#312830: marked as done ([PR 23621] [m68k] gcj-dbtool-4.0 aborts)

2005-11-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
something else? I could just update the bug reports instead of closing them, for instance. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#333536: [m68k] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage

2005-10-12 Thread Stephen R Marenka
. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] static unsigned int buggy(const unsigned int v1, const unsigned int v2, const unsigned int v3) { const long long v1_64 = (long long)v1; const long long v2_64 = (long long)v2; const long long

Bug#257012: [m68k] ICE in verify_initial_elim_offsets, at reload1.c:3367

2004-06-30 Thread Stephen R Marenka
if there anything else I can do. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#180493: m68k - ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3980

2003-04-09 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I can confirm this bug is fixed as of gcc-3.2_1:3.2.3ds6-0pre7. However, I cannot help but note the similarity to 175478. I'll comment further there. Thanks! Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpIoWvlsRboO.pgp Description: PGP

Bug#175478: m68k - ICE compiling r-base

2003-04-09 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I cannot help but notice the similarity to 180493, which is now fixed. I've encountered the same problem with r-base and put the relevant files at http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/gccbug-r-base.tar.bz2. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R

Re: binutils error? (autobuilder failure)

2003-02-07 Thread Stephen R Marenka
the problem. Btw. I was going to take a quick look at this, but I can't seem to get into the unstable chroot on crest. I thought those were supposed to be public? Or maybe I just haven't found the right command... dchroot? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing