Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-27 Thread Ketil Malde
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah, so it didn't just install it, you had it installed already, Uh, I had gcc and friends 2.9x installed, yes. > and it got upgraded. FYI, gcc-3.0 is not used by default. I noticed it also installed (upgraded, really) gcc-2.95 later on, so obviously i

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > I think both my woody and sid machines got it. > Ah, so it didn't just install it, you had it installed already, and it got upgraded. FYI, gcc-3.0 is not used by default. Calling "gcc" or "cc" will use gcc-2.95. You need to set CC=

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ketil Malde
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 16:22:56 2001 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:08:14 -0400 From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3.0 and warning!? References: <[

Re: 3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > > Hi > > Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to > upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about > it. > > I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect >

3.0 and warning!?

2001-04-26 Thread Ketil Malde
Hi Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to upgrade my gcc to 3.0. Later on, I get this horrendous warning about it. I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?! (Using woody) -kz