Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 137959 [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa
Bug#137959: blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa
Changed Bug title.
> tags 137959 + fixed
Bug#137959: [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
S
retitle 137959 [fixed in g77-3.1] blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa
tags 137959 + fixed
thanks
Philip Blundell writes:
> severity 137959 important
> thanks
>
> You wrote:
>
> > marking serious since this bug is keeping several packages out of
> > woody.
>
> Can you clarify whether this is a ne
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 03:17, Camm Maguire wrote:
> arm g77 compiler failure new to -8, must be due to a
> (default compiler upgrade on this arch
> optimizations)
Looks like the buildd just ran out of memory. Elara is not 100%
dedicated to the
Greetings! On second thought, I think my previous message was a bit
unclear.
OK, blas-1.1, which does integrity checks now as part of the build,
has built everywhere expect for hppa for some time. Coincidentally to
your note, I traced this down *last night* to a bug in the loader on
hppa which m
Greetings!
LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone
> > unnoticed previously?
>
> The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't
> see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed be
> Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone
> unnoticed previously?
The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't
see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed between then and
now, or if this is a new bug in g77.
> I'm downg
severity 137959 important
thanks
You wrote:
> marking serious since this bug is keeping several packages out of
> woody.
Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone
unnoticed previously?
I'm downgrading it to "important" on the assumption that the bug has
existed
7 matches
Mail list logo
