Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1051772 src:highway
Bug #1051772 [gcc-13] Fwd: ia64 generates wrong-code with LTO
Added indication that 1051772 affects src:highway
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1051772:
Package: gcc-13
Version: 13.2.0-3
highway does not seem to work on ia64 with LTO (see #1051769).
On yttrium with gcc-13:
% /usr/bin/g++-13 -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/home/malat/highway-1.0.7=.
-flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/pie-compile.specs
-Wformat -Werror=format-security
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1051769 src:highway
Bug #1051769 [gcc-12] ia64 generates wrong-code with LTO
Added indication that 1051769 affects src:highway
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1051769:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1051764 src:highway
Bug #1051764 [gcc-13] Missing TARGET_OPTION_SAVE/RESTORE on riscv
Added indication that 1051764 affects src:highway
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1051764:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1033007 [gcc-snapshot] Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable
split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1033007: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033007
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
please address this upstream.
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 1:20230315-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Affects: gcc-snapshot
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named:
pr104290-followup.diff was lost
Processing control commands:
> found 1016903 12.2.0-7
Bug #1016903 [g++-12] tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level
(-fno-tree-vectorize is working)
Marked as found in versions gcc-12/12.2.0-7.
--
1016903: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016903
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: found 1016903 12.2.0-7
For example ppc64:
*
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=highway=ppc64=1.0.3%7Egit20221102.4899d11-1=1667470496=0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 928224 by 1014091
Bug #928224 [valgrind] Valgrind is broken on armhf
928224 was not blocked by any bugs.
928224 was blocking: 983377
Added blocking bug(s) of 928224: 1014091
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 950188 gcc-10
Bug #950188 [gcc-10-10-20200129] gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-10-10-20200129'
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-10-10-20200129' to 'gcc-10'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug
> libgnatvsn ftbfs in 9.2.1-10
Sorry for the mess.
After a successful build, it seems that I have incorrectly played the
autoreconf/quilt refresh/scp/git commit music.
A build currently tests the following fix.
--- a/debian/patches/ada-libgnatvsn.diff
+++ b/debian/patches/ada-libgnatvsn.diff
@@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 907632 aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
Bug #907632 [gcc-8] [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Thanks for reporting this problem and generating a reduced testcase.
S.cpp is miscompiled at -O2. The test passes if it is compiled at -O0.
The hppa architecture is unique in that function pointers point to
function descriptors.
Function pointers need to be "canonicalized" before they can be
Hi,
I'm reposting this request, hopefully to the right address.
gfortran 8 will break MOD file format (gfortan 7 didn't, as was
incorrectly stated below), and I would like to add dh-fortran to track
this module change, and move .mod files out of the standard include
path, as this will break any
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:47:34 +0200
with message-id <6b415f2f-8ff1-1a6e-0d49-c5b221b02...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: g++-4.9 Mirror hash problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #843562,
regarding Fwd: g++-4.9 Mirror hash problem
to be marked as done.
This means th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 845751 gcc-6 6.2.1-4
Bug #845751 [gcc] yadifa FTBFS on ppc64el: internal compiler error: in
push_reload, at reload.c:1349
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc' to 'gcc-6'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-defaults/1.164.
Ignoring
Package: g++
Version: 4.9_4.9.2-10
apt-get install g++
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias
Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho
Se instalarán los siguientes paquetes extras:
g++-4.9 libstdc++-4.9-dev
Paquetes sugeridos:
g++-multilib g++-4.9-multilib
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 838892 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
Bug #838892 [src:gcc-6] [ppc64el] boot arguments (passed as CONFIG_CMDLINE) are
not being picked up by kernel
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # upstream : 1e407ee3b21f
> user debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-powe...@lists.debian.org (was ma...@debian.org).
> usertags 833592 powerpc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: powerpc.
> tags 833592 + patch
On 04/22/2016 12:11 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is
Hi,
could you please consider this patch for the upcoming LTS? I've just
started a thread in the gcc-patches list.
Thanks,
Daniel.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:43 AM
Subject: [PATCH] pedantic
The Total memory of the device is 512 MB, so it can run out of memory I
guess.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Jan Pruk wrote:
I was trying to compile litecoin daemon on Raspberry Pi (ARM) using
make -f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 268115 1.120exp2
Bug #268115 {Done: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com} [gcc] [PR 18589] could optimize FP multiplies
better
There is no source info for the package 'gcc' at version '1.120exp2' with
architecture ''
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 474086 src:gcc-4.7 4.7.2-4
Bug #474086 [gcc-4.2] gcc-4.2: Constant optimization for strlen() prints bogus
warnings
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-4.2'
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.2' to 'src:gcc-4.7'.
No longer marked as found in
I just got this notice that a proper fix for PR33763 was committed on
trunk and gcc-4_7-branch. So hopefully, on the next upload, this fix
will be incorporated, the broken version of pr33763.diff will be
dropped, and it will once again be possible to build glibc using the
default gcc-4.7.
(OK,
On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote:
Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
recently.
yes. but you may want to try again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org
wrote:
In good old days when I had time and motivation to maintain gcc-doc, I've
used git repos
Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
(with regular package names)
2012/9/27 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 01:05 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
(with regular package names)
It's in a similar way to GNU Make indeed. The only difference is more
than one version
Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
recently.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hello
I get an ice with gcc47 (see email below)
I am trying to reproduce it.
Shouldn't it be considered a gcc47 bug rather than a feel++ bug ?
Feel++ compiles and runs fine with gcc45, gcc46 and clang31.
Best regards
C.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lucas Nussbaum
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 676729 gcc-4.7 4.7.0-12
Bug #676729 [src:feel++] feel++: FTBFS: operators.hpp:722:1: internal compiler
error: Segmentation fault
Bug reassigned from package 'src:feel++' to 'gcc-4.7'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 95318 gcc
Bug #95318 {Done: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com}
[gcc-4.0] inefficient code with and
Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-4.0'
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.0' to 'gcc'.
Ignoring request to alter found
I asked the BTS to CC debian-gcc on this, but the message seems to
have gotten lost or something, so:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM
Subject: Bug#660955: RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 --
documentation for GCC
Samuel,
I'm terribly sorry, but most likely I won't look into this in the near
future. On weekdays, when done with current work and family stuff, I'm
usually too tired to do anything useful. And it is already clear that at
least next two weekends will also be occupied.
It is a bad idea to
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org
wrote:
In good old days when I had time and motivation to maintain gcc-doc, I've
used git repos to managed entire thing.
I've just created
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote:
I will try to look sometime soon, but can't promise when.
Hello Samuel
The gcc-doc thing you've done looks great, however it is incomplete.
Complete solution consists of gcc-doc-defaults package [contrib], and
I will try to look sometime soon, but can't promise when.
Hello Samuel
The gcc-doc thing you've done looks great, however it is incomplete.
Complete solution consists of gcc-doc-defaults package [contrib], and
several gcc-X.Y.doc-non-dfsg [non-free], that all must match each other.
There
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
Dear GCC Maintainers,
Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from
unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in
experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package?
Matthias
On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Dear
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
Hello,
The fix for GCC PR target/50906 has now been applied to gcc-4_6-branch,
so it should hopefully soon be automatically picked up in the Debian GCC
sources from that branch.
For reference, the commit log is attached below.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
On Dec 05, 2011, at 22:47, amodra at gcc dot
I am forwarding this upstream from Debian bug 644338:
http://bugs.debian.org/644338
Please see the following URL for more information about the port:
http://wiki.debian.org/PowerPCSPEPort
Your comments, suggestions, and critiques are highly appreciated.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
From: Moffett,
Hi,
pr43804.diff (in src:gcc-4.4 in Debian) has been committed as-is
upstream and needs to be applied to at least gcc-4.5 and gcc-4.6
bye,
//mirabilos
--
13:47⎜tobiasu if i were omnipotent, i would divide by zero
all day long ;)
(thinking about
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Duh, try and do it properly this time.
# Sorry for generating spurious emails.
# 566234 affects topal and adasockets, causing FTBFS on mips.
# I could set this for other maintainers, but I'll let each make their
# own decision.
affects
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# 51 and 57 are instances of 566234.
forcemerge 566234 51 57
Bug#566234: [mips only] /usr/lib/libgnarl-4.4.so: undefined reference to
`__gnat_alternate_stack'
Bug#51: topal: FTBFS on mips: undefined reference to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 508576 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38553
Bug#508576: gcc-4.3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (reproducible)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38553.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 483137 -1
Bug#483137: digikam fails to build with gcc-4.3 on powerpc -
libgreycstoration_la.all_cpp.lo
Bug 483137 cloned as bug 484775.
reassign -1 gcc-4.3
Bug#484775: digikam fails to build with gcc-4.3 on powerpc -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 439616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305
Bug#439616: gcc-snapshot: ICE: stmt marked modified after optimization pass
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32305.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 429657 -1
Bug#429657: gcc-4.1: optimisation bug abs() in nested if
Bug 429657 cloned as bug 429805.
reassign -1 abuse-sdl
Bug#429805: gcc-4.1: optimisation bug abs() in nested if
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `abuse-sdl'.
retitle -1
More dangling symlinks:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:40:19 +0200
From: Anacron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anacron job 'cron.daily' on local
/etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz is a dangling symlink
Subject: Endianness in UTF-16 encoding
From: Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:20:41 +0200
Newgroup: gmane.linux.debian.devel.java
Marcus == Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus According to Sun's API docs (Charset class), the UTF-16
Marcus encoding is supposed
* Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-18 16:05]:
I got this response from Upstream. I haven't look more deeply into the
problem, but on the one side, in the bug you claim the bug was in the
package, but upstream claims the bug is in gcc-4.2. Can you comment on
that? TIA!
Please take a
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]:
Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ?
No.
Are you sure? It does for me.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
reassign 362414 libsndfile
retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on
overflow
tags 362414 + patch
thanks
* Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-18 18:05]:
* Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]:
Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ?
No.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 362414 libsndfile
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-snapshot' to `libsndfile'.
retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on
overflow
Bug#362414: abs() returns a
* Martin Michlmayr:
Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ?
No.
Then it's a real bug in -fwrapv support, I guess. Without -fwrapv,
all bets are off AFAICS because the example code results in signed
integer overflow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]:
Does help to change definition of sum_abs from int to unsigned int ?
Yes.
Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ?
No.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
How have you been,
Save Your Heaaalthhh and M0NNNEYYY.
We are your One Stop Sh0ppp for Considerable [EMAIL PROTECTED] D!s_c0untts=20
-
copy the address below and paste in your web browser:
Acroceridae.newtechtown.com/?zz=3Dlowcost
Law Christopher
Kruse Norberto
Breaking news alert issue - big news coming.
Allixon International Corporation
A X C P . P K
We give it to you again as a gift. This company is doing
incredible things. They have cash and have made great
strategic aquisitions. Current price is $4.70.
Short term projection is $8. This company
Hi,
term-life-insurers currentlyOffering bestThings:
+Svings up to 7O%
+QuicklyQuote Turnaround
+SmokersApproved!
TakesOnlyMinutes:
http://www.lifequotesgalore.com
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2B65D1340D4;
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:40:36 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: [Fwd: Log for successful build of gcc-4.0_4.0.1-3 (dist=unstable)]
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Mosberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-Q7mDYU0KsSQvfEbUVc/d
Date: Tue, 02
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-3
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is
greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64.
fyi, still exists in 1:3.3.5-13
---BeginMessage---
Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107
Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2107
---End Message---
dann frazier writes:
fyi, still exists in 1:3.3.5-13
yes, I didn't fix it. it's fixed in 3.4 and 4.0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enter tempting world of Teen Playground!
Inside you will find horny untouched virgins, real first timers.
They are so shy and innocent, that only big sum of money can awake their fucking instincts!
But when this girlies feel huge cock inside them, they become real sexual
furies!
Join now, and
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Filing as a bug so we don't lose track of this...
---BeginMessage---
Hi Matthias,
Are you already aware of the problem mentioned in the mail below?
Assuming the offending line is reachable at all, it will cause a
SIGSEGV on ia64 due to pointer-value
cc -O
-I/build/buildd/freebsd-buildutils-5.2.1+20040403/build-tree/src/usr.bin/make
-DMAKE_VERSION=\5200209170\ -DDEFSHELL=1 -O2 -g -Wall -c buf.c
buf.c: In function `Buf_GetAll':
buf.c:312: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 32 26 52 (nil) (use (reg/i:SI 28 %r28)) -1 (insn_list 39
reassign 225039 pine
thanks
It's not a bug. By default it is trying to build 64-bit, so it isn't
working.
Either prepend sparc32 to the command, or touch /etc/disable_64_gcc.
Santiago Vila writes:
reassign 225039 gcc-defaults
thanks
The submitter has confirmed that this problem goes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 225039 pine
Bug#225039: can't build pine-4.58 on sparc; incompatible ssl libraries
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-defaults' to `pine'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 225039 pine
thanks
It's not a bug. By default it is trying to build 64-bit, so it isn't
working.
Either prepend sparc32 to the command, or touch /etc/disable_64_gcc.
I don't fully understand, could you please elaborate?
Why should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 225039 gcc-defaults
Bug#225039: can't build pine-4.58 on sparc; incompatible ssl libraries
Bug reassigned from package `pine' to `gcc-defaults'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
(damn, this mailer sucks, sorry for any mangling)
Bryce Wilcox-O'Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use Crypto++ v5.0 [1], and I've noticed that the generate a random
RSA key pair function either seg faults or goes into an infinite
loop. I've learned that turning optimization off with -O0 or else
In reference to a message from Daniel Jacobowitz, dated Oct 31:
Are you sure he doesn't mean --enable-checking? --enable-debug should
not affect compile time significantly.
yup, David confirmed he meant enable-checking. thanks for the quick
reply.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux
- Forwarded message from Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug in libstdc++2.10-dev
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:33:34 +0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Randolph Chung,
Colin Watson writes:
Somebody with access to debian-gcc CVS - not me - needs to add a
'passwd' file in CVSROOT mapping anonymous to some real user (debbugs
has anonymous:69S/nLyi1wYKc:debbugs, the password field is just a
crypted empty string) and a 'readers' file containing just anonymous.
Hi Mathhias,
Colin Watson writes:
Somebody with access to debian-gcc CVS - not me - needs to add a
'passwd' file in CVSROOT mapping anonymous to some real user (debbugs
has anonymous:69S/nLyi1wYKc:debbugs, the password field is just a
crypted empty string) and a 'readers' file containing
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: gcc-3.3_3.3ds0-0pre0_s390.changes is NEW
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 13:17:23 -0500
From: Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(new) cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-0pre0_all.deb optional doc
Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
Hi glibc and gcc Maintainers,
I need some help with this bugreport. I checked that the problem is
reproduceable. Could someone please verify that the problem description
is correct. Do you think the solution is the right one?
Thanks
Christoph
---BeginMessage---
Package: libssl0.9.6
Philip Blundell schrieb:
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 07:38, Christoph Martin wrote:
I need some help with this bugreport. I checked that the problem is
reproduceable. Could someone please verify that the problem description
is correct. Do you think the solution is the right one?
;
}
Does this
I think this should probably have gone to you folks...
--
When you get to the heart,
use a knife and fork.
- From instructions on how to eat an artichoke.
---BeginMessage---
Hello.
I just did an apt-get upgrade, which updated libstdc++
and a bunch of other packages. After the upgrade apt-get
Hi gcc-maintainer,
do you know anything about a fix, so that gcc does not cmov code with
the -mcpu=i686 option?
Christoph
---BeginMessage---
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 13:04, Christoph Martin wrote:
Am Die, 2002-11-05 um 01.34 schrieb GOTO Masanori:
At Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:07:56 +0100,
forwarded to bts for the record...
- Forwarded message from John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] FWD: Bug#162690: [parisc]gcc 3.x produces openssl
test code that SEGVs with -march=2.0 and optimization 0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John David Anglin [EMAIL
: [Galeon-user] Fwd: Galeon 1.2.5 patch
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Some background you might or might not be aware of:
Closed-source Netscape plugins compiled with gcc-g++ v2.x expect
certain symbols to be in libstdc++. Unfortunately, the
libstdc
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 07:24:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I've been out of the loop for some time. Has there been any
discussion of this?
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] did some preparations for such an
upgrade. Basically if Debian should change the sonames of the
libstdc++
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
2) To some degree this is inevitable. Because no matter how we handle
this, the sonames are not likely to change. I'm not sure of a good
way to control this.
Is it possible to select which shared library to load
depending on the NEEDED
As a short followup, I've had reports that the DAC960 driver compiles
correctly with gcc-3.0 and one report that 3.1 works as well. I've heard
mostly rumours that other known kernel driver miscompilation problems are
also fixed in gcc 3.x. Unfortunately, I do not have a DAC960 nor any of
the
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: New gcc-3.1 packages (including gnat)
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 21:26:05 +0200
From: Gerhard Tonn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 06 April 2002 21:21, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 20:17,
FYI -randolph
- Forwarded message from Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:10:30 -0800
From: Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: gcc profiling broken on Linux/ia64?
Reply-To: Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16aLgk-0006pw-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:00:30 +
Subject: [Fwd: [Patch] (3.0.4pre, arm) : get libstdc++ working]
From: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-G+W4MdJLih5rC9goSUZQ
X
Just a heads up -- there may be a ia64 patch needed for gcc-3.0. When I
have some time I'll look at pulling the patches and testing them for
ia64..
randolph
- Forwarded message from David Mosberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: David Mosberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 103051 + patch
Bug#103051: fastjar: Please include man page
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Ack! Didn't realise that we still weren't including that patch
Well, I'm trying to compile WITH the patch again :-P Either way, I'll
figure this out...
C
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
Oops...forgot to cc the list :-P
-- Forwarded message --
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:22:10AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
One more follow-up...with the fsirl patch, compilation of gcc still fails
(see below). I *might* be able to correct this *if* it's meant to
produce proper DWARF debugging output. Otherwise, I'm faced with a
terrible
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I don't get it. Are you getting an ICE or a segfault in binutils?
Segfault when I run 'strip -g' twice on the same binary (usually an object
file from an ar archive). Any readelf/objcopy/etc on that file after
the first run of strip segfaults
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
