On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus
> error. Maybe this is a gcc issue?
It's probably a good idea to try gcc-snapshot and see if this has been
fixed already. In the worst cases, gcc hackers somet
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> >
> > vore:~> dpkg
> > Bus error
>
> Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus
> error. Maybe this is a gcc issue?
FWIW, the comment here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Adam Heath wrote:
> Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus
> error. Maybe this is a gcc issue?
gcc 3.2 also fails, but 2.95 works fine, no errors.
lib/myopt.c(loadcfgfile)
doogie: Did that ever stop anything from breaking?
with -O2, i
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:01:14 -0500 (CDT),
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >
> > > It was reported by joshk on IRC, but I'm not still clear where this
> > > problem come from. Example:
> > >
> > > ultra30:~> dpkg -s
4 matches
Mail list logo
