Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, 18 Jan 2005
15:09:11 +0100
From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Tue, 18 Jan
-upstream
Tags added: upstream
retitle 293076 [fixed in 3.4] g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class
missing
Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 91823 gcc-2.95
Bug#91823: binutils will not build on arm
Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `gcc-2.95'.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:51 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#91846: g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but
not package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 90143 wishlist
Bug#90143: source parallelisation suggestion
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
(MET)
Received: from sergio by TodoSCSI with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14fBlN-0005lK-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:20:45 +0100
From: Sergio González González [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I can not install the package because of 'error code (1
]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upstream changelog missing
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
Sender
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Change to Suggests
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
X-Reportbug-Version
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.95.3-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 12375 + fixed
Bug#12375: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code !
Tags added: fixed
tag 20606 + fixed
Bug#20606: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption
Tags added: fixed
tag 20889 + fixed
Bug#20889: [Fixed in
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#92526: glibc missing vital component
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 93226 libglib1.2
Bug#93226: Optimisation bug when building gnome-pim 1.4.0 with -O2
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-2.95' to `libglib1.2'.
rename 93266 Bit tests are redefined when G_CAN_INLINE is defined (in glib.h)
Unknown command or
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 87909 [workaround applied] not installable on the Hurd
Bug#87909: not installable on the Hurd
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13KL3d-00048N-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 08:29:09 -0500
Received: from chris by koenig with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13KL3V-eM-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:29:01 +0200
From: Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
(Debian))
id 14mo1k-u0-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400
From: Ben Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pragma pack works on x86; ignored on arm
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 94137 gcc
Bug#94137: octave gives wrong results on Alpha 21264
Bug reassigned from package `octave' to `gcc'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 94981 No help available for Vim
Bug#94981: [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
retitle 94891 [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build-depends wrong on hurd-i386
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:02:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-2.95
Severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 95800 libdb2
Bug#95800: upgrade is broken
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `libdb2'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 95955 gcc-2.95
Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'.
retitle 95955 gcc-2.95.4: fails to compile glibc, but 2.95.3-11 works
Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source
Changed Bug title.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 95978 gcc-2.95
Bug#95978: glibc; Fails to build from source
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 30774
Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 30774 !
Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit
Bug reopened, originator
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 97030 normal
Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
Severity set to `normal'.
retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation
Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:35:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #95318,
regarding gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:39:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #97904,
regarding gcc-3.0: Pointless moving
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 43170 [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a
class
Bug#43170: Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class
Changed Bug title.
forwarded 43170 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 63546 amaya
Bug#63546: mistranslation of amaya on ix86
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `amaya'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
19:07:59 -
Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1
(Debian))
id 14vkvk-0008LC-00; Fri, 04 May 2001 21:07:56 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2
X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Typo in Suggests
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:06 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Should have versioned depend on libgcc0?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Reportbug-Version
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#94791: pine fails to compile
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 100447 grave
Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 100447 100459
Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails
Bug#100459: Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails
Merged 100447 100459.
thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Jun 2001 19:39:00 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian
8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IHcvEK025412;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:38:57 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking
+1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by MrSilly.MrMen (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id
f5IDkOSP001769;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:46:24 +1000
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: crazney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcj
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 62309 + fixed
Bug#62309: [fixed in 3.0] Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got fatal
signal 11
Tags added: fixed
tags 83221 + fixed
Bug#83221: [fixed in 3.0] g++ dies with internal error
Tags added: fixed
tags 87540 + fixed
Bug#87540:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 101795 perl
Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not
found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3)
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `perl'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15DO85-0008P5-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:33 +0200
From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: g++-3.0 and --use-cxa-atexit
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug
: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15Dwlo-00016V-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:24:52 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgcj2-dev depends on nonexisting libgcc0
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17
X
bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15CzdX-00080M-00; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:16:23 +0200
From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gccbug-3.0 failure
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Jun 2001 23:25:52 +0200
From: André Dahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: README.FIRST says gcc-3.0 is a development snapshot
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:25:51 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:14 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line r-base on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgcc_s.so.0 not found
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:35:46 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcj
Version: 2:3.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: has this been fixed? or still there?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 79241 kicq
Bug#79241: improper (or failed) handeling of -I
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kicq'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 84935 aptitude
Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator,
.extern.uni-tuebingen.de
via sendmail from stdin
id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: main
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 90363 + fixed
Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
Tags added: fixed
reassign 90363 g77-2.95
Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `g77-2.95'.
retitle 90363 [fixed in g77-3.0] f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 88260 g++-2.95
Bug#88260: No warning for missing return in non-void member func
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'.
retitle 88260 [fixed in g++-3.0] No warning for missing return in non-void
member func
Bug#88260: No warning
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#102451: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Received: from idalton by heathen.mentasm.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14ehXu-00033P-00; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:04:50 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: source parallelisation suggestion
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 81338 wontfix
Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166
Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative
Tags added: wontfix
tags 74426 wontfix
Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative
Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 99038 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#99038: internal error using static synchronized
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 99038 [PR java/3490] internal error using static synchronized
Bug#99038: internal error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 102353 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 102353 [PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 85908 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/stddef.h
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 85908 [PR preprocessor/3487] unrecognized token before #include
points to wrong source
Bug#85908:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 81122 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#81122: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though)
Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 81122 [PR c++/3494] Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 55298 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#55298: function attributes should apply to function pointers too
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 55298 [PR c/3481] function attributes should apply to function
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 20695 normal
Bug#20695: regparm/profiling breakage (fixed with gcc-3.0)
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 102473 + unreproduceable
Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending.
Bug#102473: #include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 100166 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 43170 g++-2.95
Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `g++-2.95'.
tags 43170 + fixed
Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 84969 gcc
Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm
Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm
Bug reassigned from package `php4' to `gcc'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle #84969 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm
Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm
Changed Bug title.
retitle #83550 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm
Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm
Changed Bug title.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 88959 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge substrings
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 88959 [PR optimization/3513]: GCC doesn't merge substrings
Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 85535 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#85535: gcc: builtin memcmp() could be optimised
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 85535 [PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised
Bug#85535: gcc:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 75773 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 75773 [PR optimization/3507]: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on
i386
1 - 100 of 10340 matches
Mail list logo
