Re: Bug#95332: Already documented

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:42:21 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, /usr/include/error.h is now documented in the info pages, under the > "Error Messages" node. This is on glibc-doc 2.3.1-8. And according to > the info page, these functions are GNU extensions. That's right. > So I pro

Re: Bug#174290: Bug already fixed

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:21:21 +0200, Andres Soolo wrote: > 'Twas Mon, 2002-Dec-30. Quoth H. S. Teoh, > > Hi, /usr/include/elf.h in libc6-dev (2.3.1-8) seems to have already fixed > > this problem: > > Yes, it is fixed there. > > > Unless this file contains architecture-dependent contents, I propo

Re: Bug#143531: Already fixed

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:56:49 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, this bug has already been fixed in glibc-doc 2.3.1-8. The relevent > section from the info pages read: > > [snip] > - Macro: int O_READ > Open the file for reading. Same as `O_RDONLY'; only defined on > GNU

Bug#95332: marked as done (error() undocumented)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:10:05 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#95332: Already documented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

2002-12-31 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Tue Dec 31 02:34:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/document-fix.dpatch: Applied patches sent by H. S. Teoh and GOTO Masanori. (Closes: #117680, #16) Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom

2002-12-31 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Tue Dec 31 02:34:28 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/document-fix.dpatch: Applied patches sent by H. S. Teoh and GOTO Masanori. (Closes: #117680, #16) Files: changed:0list added: document-fi

Bug#143531: marked as done (glibc-doc: Typo in `File Access Modes' node)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:20:11 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#143531: Already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#117680: [PATCH]

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:21:26 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, does the attached patch qualify as a fix for this bug? :-) Personally > I don't see a need for ispell'ing C header files. (Doing an ispell on C > *strings* in a file might be a different story, because users may actual

Bug#117680: [PATCH]

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 06:36:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:21:26 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > So I propose just applying the attached patch and closing this bug. > > Thanks! > > Thanks for your patch! > > I applied it into debian-glibc cvs

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > BTW, from manpages umount(2): > > HISTORY >The original umount function was called as umount(device) and would >return ENOTBLK w

Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 12:20:01AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 18:01:10 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > At any rate, I tried this with xterm, and got: > > xterm: unable to access pty device: Permission denied > > > > I'm not sure if Branden worke

call china 6.2¢ www.callez.com

2002-12-31 Thread promotion

Bug#174781: more issues

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Eichin
Actually, the libc6 upgrade breaks ssh-krb5 with exactly the same log. Restarting ssh-krb5 fixes it, but that doesn't get done automatically; perhaps this libc needs a resurrection of the "some services need restarting" postinst... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: #174540 seems to be introduced by libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Bug#174540: libc6-2.3.1-{7,8) breaks apt-get (and more) on mips Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2'. > retitle 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15 breaks apt (and more) on mips Bug#174540

Bug#174540: #174540 seems to be introduced by libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15

2002-12-31 Thread Siggy Brentrup
reassign 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 retitle 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15 breaks apt (and more) on mips severity 174540 grave done Since I noticed this problem after an upgrade from libc6-2.3.1-5 to libc6-2.3.1-8, initially reported the bug against libc6. I'm in doubt which of both package

Re: Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:42:27 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 12:20:01AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 18:01:10 -0500, > > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > > At any rate, I tried this with xterm, and got: > > > xterm: u

Bug#121899: marked as done (libc6: getpt() documentation [no manpage, woohoo!] tells filthy lies about how getpt() works, causing innocent programs to SEGV)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:42:31 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:10:56 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, > > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > BTW, from manpages umount(2): > > > > HISTORY > >The or

Re: Regex update

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:46:45 -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > We've been waiting based on Neuro's advice that sometimes Arm bugs are > difficult to test for. The buildd is broken in that it appears to > select the wrong header. Because all I have is a remote account on an > Arm box, I can't test X - w

«õ¤«»P¬D¤ô

2002-12-31 Thread altera00
Title: «õ ¤« »P ¬D ¤ô ¦³¤G­Ó©M©|¦í¦b¹j¾À¡A©Ò¿×¹j¾À¬O¹j¾À¨º®y¤s¡A¥L­Ì¤À§O¦b¬Û¾Fªº¤G®y¤s¤Wªº¼q¸Ì¡A [EMAIL PROTECTED]|¨C¤Ñ³£·|[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ³o®y¤sªº©M©|¨S¦³¤U¤s¬D¤ô¡A¥kÃ䨺®y¤sªº©M©|¤ß·Q¡G¡u¥L¤j·§ºÎ¹LÀY¤F

Re: Bug#95332: Already documented

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:42:21 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, /usr/include/error.h is now documented in the info pages, under the > "Error Messages" node. This is on glibc-doc 2.3.1-8. And according to > the info page, these functions are GNU extensions. That's right. > So I pro

Re: Bug#174290: Bug already fixed

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:21:21 +0200, Andres Soolo wrote: > 'Twas Mon, 2002-Dec-30. Quoth H. S. Teoh, > > Hi, /usr/include/elf.h in libc6-dev (2.3.1-8) seems to have already fixed > > this problem: > > Yes, it is fixed there. > > > Unless this file contains architecture-dependent contents, I propo

Re: Bug#143531: Already fixed

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:56:49 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, this bug has already been fixed in glibc-doc 2.3.1-8. The relevent > section from the info pages read: > > [snip] > - Macro: int O_READ > Open the file for reading. Same as `O_RDONLY'; only defined on > GNU

Bug#95332: marked as done (error() undocumented)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:10:05 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#95332: Already documented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom

2002-12-31 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Tue Dec 31 02:34:28 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/document-fix.dpatch: Applied patches sent by H. S. Teoh and GOTO Masanori. (Closes: #117680, #16) Files: changed:0list added: document-fi

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

2002-12-31 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Tue Dec 31 02:34:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/document-fix.dpatch: Applied patches sent by H. S. Teoh and GOTO Masanori. (Closes: #117680, #16) Files: changed:changelog

Bug#143531: marked as done (glibc-doc: Typo in `File Access Modes' node)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:20:11 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#143531: Already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#117680: [PATCH]

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:21:26 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, does the attached patch qualify as a fix for this bug? :-) Personally > I don't see a need for ispell'ing C header files. (Doing an ispell on C > *strings* in a file might be a different story, because users may actual

Bug#117680: [PATCH]

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 06:36:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:21:26 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > So I propose just applying the attached patch and closing this bug. > > Thanks! > > Thanks for your patch! > > I applied it into debian-glibc cvs

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > BTW, from manpages umount(2): > > HISTORY >The original umount function was called as umount(device) and would >return ENOTBLK w

Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults

2002-12-31 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 12:20:01AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 18:01:10 -0500, > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > At any rate, I tried this with xterm, and got: > > xterm: unable to access pty device: Permission denied > > > > I'm not sure if Branden worke

call china 6.2¢ www.callez.com

2002-12-31 Thread promotion

Bug#174781: more issues

2002-12-31 Thread Mark Eichin
Actually, the libc6 upgrade breaks ssh-krb5 with exactly the same log. Restarting ssh-krb5 fixes it, but that doesn't get done automatically; perhaps this libc needs a resurrection of the "some services need restarting" postinst...

Processed: #174540 seems to be introduced by libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Bug#174540: libc6-2.3.1-{7,8) breaks apt-get (and more) on mips Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2'. > retitle 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15 breaks apt (and more) on mips Bug#174540

Bug#174540: #174540 seems to be introduced by libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15

2002-12-31 Thread Siggy Brentrup
reassign 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 retitle 174540 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15 breaks apt (and more) on mips severity 174540 grave done Since I noticed this problem after an upgrade from libc6-2.3.1-5 to libc6-2.3.1-8, initially reported the bug against libc6. I'm in doubt which of both package

Re: Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:42:27 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 12:20:01AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 18:01:10 -0500, > > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > > At any rate, I tried this with xterm, and got: > > > xterm: u

Bug#121899: marked as done (libc6: getpt() documentation [no manpage, woohoo!] tells filthy lies about how getpt() works, causing innocent programs to SEGV)

2002-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:42:31 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#121899: No wonder it segfaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#129550: [PATCH] Proposed rewording of umount() info doc

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:10:56 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:16:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:10:19 -0500, > > H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > BTW, from manpages umount(2): > > > > HISTORY > >The or

Re: Regex update

2002-12-31 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:46:45 -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > We've been waiting based on Neuro's advice that sometimes Arm bugs are > difficult to test for. The buildd is broken in that it appears to > select the wrong header. Because all I have is a remote account on an > Arm box, I can't test X - w