Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
snippet from my log - you can reproduce by trying to build dosfstools
on ia64. I tested this specifically to look for regressions, because
I recall this being broken & fixed at one point (can't find the bug report
at th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
snippet from my log - you can reproduce by trying to build dosfstools
on ia64. I tested this specifically to look for regressions, because
I recall this being broken & fixed at one point (can't find the bug report
at th
Your message dated 11/11/2003 5:42:14 PM
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Save up to 89% on Ink + No Shipping Cost
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Save up to 89% on Inkjet, Laser & Copier Supplies
Quality Products, with 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
Easy, Fast, Affordable Shipping Worldwide
Plenty of Payment Options to Meet YOUR Needs!
>> SPECIAL: FREE Shipping to US & Canada on Orders over $50 <<
Visit us on the web at http://sale59.eXcu
Your message dated 11/11/2003 5:42:14 PM
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Save up to 89% on Ink + No Shipping Cost
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Save up to 89% on Inkjet, Laser & Copier Supplies
Quality Products, with 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
Easy, Fast, Affordable Shipping Worldwide
Plenty of Payment Options to Meet YOUR Needs!
>> SPECIAL: FREE Shipping to US & Canada on Orders over $50 <<
Visit us on the web at http://sale59.eXcu
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Yeah, there was another bug against cyrus for this, with patch, but I
> didn't make any sort of connection. Good to know I've just whacked
> three bugs for the price of one...
Think of it this way. It feels that much better when
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:12:14AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> You probably want this FAQ entry:
Which, I've been informed, is in fact in README.Debian.gz.
> * errno: If a program uses the variable "errno", then it _must_
> include . The old libc often (erroneously) declared this
> variable
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Yeah, there was another bug against cyrus for this, with patch, but I
> didn't make any sort of connection. Good to know I've just whacked
> three bugs for the price of one...
Think of it this way. It feels that much better when
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:12:14AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> You probably want this FAQ entry:
Which, I've been informed, is in fact in README.Debian.gz.
> * errno: If a program uses the variable "errno", then it _must_
> include . The old libc often (erroneously) declared this
> variable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 220232 important
Bug#220232: libpt: ptlib.h includes both time.h and linux/time.h
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220232 linux-kernel-headers
Bug#220232: libpt: ptlib.h includes both time.h and linux/time.h
Warning: Unknown package 'libpt'
Bug reassigned from package `libpt' to `linux-kernel-headers'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Hi,
here is a patch that makes linux/time.h work alongside with time.h for
userspace inclusion.
I include for userspace and don't redefine some structures. A
problem might be that some of the elements of the structures have
different names in time.h I think. The case I had (openh323) only
needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 220232 important
Bug#220232: libpt: ptlib.h includes both time.h and linux/time.h
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220232 linux-kernel-headers
Bug#220232: libpt: ptlib.h includes both time.h and linux/time.h
Warning: Unknown package 'libpt'
Bug reassigned from package `libpt' to `linux-kernel-headers'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Hi,
here is a patch that makes linux/time.h work alongside with time.h for
userspace inclusion.
I include for userspace and don't redefine some structures. A
problem might be that some of the elements of the structures have
different names in time.h I think. The case I had (openh323) only
needed
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:19, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >> I also tested on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, even with removing
> >> ~/.xmms. However I cannot reproduce it... Which CPU do yo
Hallo,ich
sammel schon seit 22 Jahren Kugelschreiber,leider ist es mir noch nicht
gelungen, einen Kulimit Ihrem Logo zu bekommen. Können sie mir eventuell
weiterhelfen?Im Vorraus vielen Dank.Mit freundlichen
GrüßenKirsten SchnabelMeine Adresse lautet:Kirsten
SchnabelProsperstr. 36946238
B
I'm also suffering from this bug, with the headers from
libbluetooth1-dev (which I maintain.)
/usr/include/bluetooth/rfcomm.h:#define RFCOMMGETDEVLIST
_IOR('R', 210, int)
means this doesn't compile:
if (ioctl(ctl, RFCOMMGETDEVLIST, (void *) dl) < 0) {
with an error "warning: signed and u
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:19, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >> I also tested on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, even with removing
> >> ~/.xmms. However I cannot reproduce it... Which CPU do yo
Hallo,ich
sammel schon seit 22 Jahren Kugelschreiber,leider ist es mir noch nicht
gelungen, einen Kulimit Ihrem Logo zu bekommen. Können sie mir eventuell
weiterhelfen?Im Vorraus vielen Dank.Mit freundlichen
GrüßenKirsten SchnabelMeine Adresse lautet:Kirsten
SchnabelProsperstr. 36946238
B
I'm also suffering from this bug, with the headers from
libbluetooth1-dev (which I maintain.)
/usr/include/bluetooth/rfcomm.h:#define RFCOMMGETDEVLIST
_IOR('R', 210, int)
means this doesn't compile:
if (ioctl(ctl, RFCOMMGETDEVLIST, (void *) dl) < 0) {
with an error "warning: signed and u
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
>>> I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds*
>>> versions. Also since libc 2.3 I cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6, I
>>> get:
>>>
>>> Inconsistency detected by ld.so:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds* versions.
> > Also since libc 2.3 I cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6, I get:
> >
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: Assertion
> > `_rtld_loc
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
>>> I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds*
>>> versions. Also since libc 2.3 I cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6, I
>>> get:
>>>
>>> Inconsistency detected by ld.so:
This bug ONLY (!) occurs under kernel-2.6.0!
With kernel-2.4.22 or 23 it's fine.
Note that both bug reporters report using a 2.6.x system!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame E
Hi,
At Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:35:14 +0100,
Felix Seeger wrote:
> I found this
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2003/debian-glibc-200311/msg00339.html
> while searching for the bug.
>
> I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds* versions.
> Also since libc 2.3 I cannot
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds* versions.
> > Also since libc 2.3 I cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6, I get:
> >
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: Assertion
> > `_rtld_loc
This bug ONLY (!) occurs under kernel-2.6.0!
With kernel-2.4.22 or 23 it's fine.
Note that both bug reporters report using a 2.6.x system!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame E
Hi,
At Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:35:14 +0100,
Felix Seeger wrote:
> I found this
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2003/debian-glibc-200311/msg00339.html
> while searching for the bug.
>
> I also have this problem, this is since I updated libc to the -ds* versions.
> Also since libc 2.3 I cannot
This one time, at band camp, GOTO Masanori said:
> Hi,
>
> At Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:33:33 -0500,
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
> > is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc
> At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:20:05 -0500,
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>
This one time, at band camp, GOTO Masanori said:
> Hi,
>
> At Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:33:33 -0500,
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
> > is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc
> At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:20:05 -0500,
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>
Hi,
At Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:33:33 -0500,
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
> is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc
At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:20:05 -0500,
Stephen Gran wrote:
> It looks like it is also a problem on mipsel, arm and sparc.
Th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:09:15PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
> /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell
> me anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good
> reason, apparently).
> Might I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:09:15PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
> /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell me
> anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good reason,
> apparently).
>
> Might I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:37:16PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> [Not subscribed; MFT set]
>
> As a followup to my previous missive about appropriate placement of the FAQ,
> I've found that, in fact, the FAQ does not contain enlightenment in the
> matter at hand. This sucks rather hard, as I hav
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
I get the following error when installing
kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686:
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown error code
(139(
failed to create initrd image
NOTE: ldd /bin/bash gives the same error
Debian 3.0r1 kernel 2.2.20
___
Hi,
At Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:33:33 -0500,
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it
> is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc
At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:20:05 -0500,
Stephen Gran wrote:
> It looks like it is also a problem on mipsel, arm and sparc.
Th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:09:15PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
> /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell
> me anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good
> reason, apparently).
> Might I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:09:15PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
> /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell me
> anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good reason,
> apparently).
>
> Might I
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:37:16PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> [Not subscribed; MFT set]
>
> As a followup to my previous missive about appropriate placement of the FAQ,
> I've found that, in fact, the FAQ does not contain enlightenment in the
> matter at hand. This sucks rather hard, as I hav
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
I get the following error when installing
kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686:
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown error code
(139(
failed to create initrd image
NOTE: ldd /bin/bash gives the same error
Debian 3.0r1 kernel 2.2.20
___
-- Virus Warning Message (on relay2)
Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file Installation6.exe
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft
-- Virus Warning Message (on relay2)
Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file update93.exe
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
-- Virus Warning Message (on relay2)
Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file Installation6.exe
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft
-- Virus Warning Message (on relay2)
Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file update93.exe
The uncleanable file is deleted.
-
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
[Not subscribed; MFT set]
As a followup to my previous missive about appropriate placement of the FAQ,
I've found that, in fact, the FAQ does not contain enlightenment in the
matter at hand. This sucks rather hard, as I have no fscking idea what's
going on without it.
The only error message I ha
I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
/usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell me
anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good reason,
apparently).
Might I suggest that this error message (and anything similar) point to a
web versi
[Not subscribed; MFT set]
As a followup to my previous missive about appropriate placement of the FAQ,
I've found that, in fact, the FAQ does not contain enlightenment in the
matter at hand. This sucks rather hard, as I have no fscking idea what's
going on without it.
The only error message I ha
I've just gotten a bug report (#219584) which points me to
/usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz. Nice, except that the FAQ doesn't tell me
anything - presumably since I'm not running unstable (for good reason,
apparently).
Might I suggest that this error message (and anything similar) point to a
web versi
52 matches
Mail list logo
