At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:53:02 -0400,
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:47:04AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >You argument is no sense for me without code.
>
> That's ridiculous. You can agree or disagree in principle without code.
> I can't believe that anyone would waste time codi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:47:04AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
You argument is no sense for me without code.
That's ridiculous. You can agree or disagree in principle without code.
I can't believe that anyone would waste time coding when you seem so
unwilling to consider changes.
Mike Stone
At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:13:51 +0200,
Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> W liście z sob, 25-09-2004, godz. 14:17, GOTO Masanori pisze:
> > My intension of (3) is to know which library is used. Check
> > /etc/ld.so.conf.
>
> I don`t use any preloaded library (e.g. no /etc/ld.so.preload).
>
> [EMAIL PROT
At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:49 +0200,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > This locale is needed for the upcoming Malagasy translation of Debian
> > > Installer, planned to be achieved by Jaonary Rabarisoa <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]>.
> >
> > Do you have still plan to support mg_MG in debian-installer?
>
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:34:07 +0200,
Ulf Härnhammar wrote:
> As you can see, you can make a program pause for several minutes with this
> technique. I'm not quite sure where the buffering comes from, if it's Perl or
> what. I suppose I should try this in some other language.
kill -SIGSTOP can also
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:59 -0700,
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wr
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:15:23 -0400,
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:19:42PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 07:23:27 -0400,
> >Michael Stone wrote:
> >> No, not date. date has nothing to do with this, it's a libc function
> >> (which is why it's reassigned to li
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > > Steph
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > > Steph
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
Monsieur/Madame,
Nous sommes des Promoteurs de Football Camerounais. Nous sommes des
representant d'Agents de Joueurs FIFA agrées. Nous sommes basés au Cameroun.
Nous souhaitons etroitement travailler avec vous en matiere d'organisation
de Tournoi de Football. Car, Avec la Collaboaration de la M
Monsieur/Madame,
Nous sommes des Promoteurs de Football Camerounais. Nous sommes des
representant d'Agents de Joueurs FIFA agrées. Nous sommes basés au Cameroun.
Nous souhaitons etroitement travailler avec vous en matiere d'organisation
de Tournoi de Football. Car, Avec la Collaboaration de la M
Quoting GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How to allow pauses and single-stepping? Bugtraq does not say about
> the latter things.
http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/Aug/0281.html
"You can essentially single-step through the
library calls of a binary by turning on verbose debugging thro
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:19:42PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 07:23:27 -0400,
Michael Stone wrote:
No, not date. date has nothing to do with this, it's a libc function
(which is why it's reassigned to libc). I fully agree that *libc* should
handle the case differently, it's bee
Your message dated Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:56:01 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: xmms/libmikmod2 bug is grave]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:00:08 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187385: Wine/Mono app crashes with SIGSEGV on dlopen()
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:57:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221401: libc6: dlopen error resolved reinstalling nvidia drivers.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
17 matches
Mail list logo
