From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:07:28 +0900
> I have a question about optimization package: libc6-sparcv9 and
> libc6-sparcv9b. Both packages are prepared for optimized versions of
> libc6. They are currently supported - but I would like to know what
> the advan
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:41:39 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
> > Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
> >>
> >> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
> >>
> >> The last word should surely be "confor
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:05:42 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> I guess you will generally have many more issues than this one when you
> try to build 64-bit packages on a 32-bit buildd (e.g. compiling and
> running 64-bit programs from configure scripts, running 'make check' or
> 'make test' targe
My name is Julie. I am a high school senior in Houston, TX.
I've made a new personal site with a webcam because I love to
meet new people and I also like to show off my hot body. I
thought you may like to check it out. It's completely free.
http://www.cassidythedog.com/ju18/
you
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:00:23 +0100,
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I don't think this is just a dpkg-dev bug, these "bi-arch" systems need
> to provide ldd or an equivalent that can read either form of shared
> library that it would support.
>
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes ca
Author: gotom
Date: 2005-08-18 05:14:28 + (Thu, 18 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 1004
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
add #323560.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debia
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:04:35 +0200,
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:47:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Please try: ls -al /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive .
> > If it's existed, then try to remove this file and invoke locale -a again.
> > I guess it's simply locales.prerm bug.
>
Hi,
I have a question about optimization package: libc6-sparcv9 and
libc6-sparcv9b. Both packages are prepared for optimized versions of
libc6. They are currently supported - but I would like to know what
the advantage of those packages is. Just optimization? Are those
packages widely used?
T
Author: gotom
Date: 2005-08-18 04:09:13 + (Thu, 18 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 1002
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/hppa.mk
Log:
- debian/control.in/mai
Author: gotom
Date: 2005-08-18 04:11:46 + (Thu, 18 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 1003
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.prerm
Log:
* debian/debhelper.in/locales.prerm: Add purge to remove locale-archive.
(Closes: #321719)
Author: gotom
Date: 2005-08-18 04:00:27 + (Thu, 18 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 1001
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
Log:
* Build-Depends fixes:
- debian/control.in/main: Change gcc-* dep
My name is Julie. I am a high school senior in Houston, TX.
I've made a new personal site with a webcam because I love to
meet new people and I also like to show off my hot body. I
thought you may like to check it out. It's completely free.
http://www.brucereeattax.com/ju18/
you
My name is Julie :) This whole semester I felt like I want to do something
I've never done before.. idea came to me
to have my videos I made with my old boyfriend online ;p. My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) Verify your age and connect to my webcam today
-)
Come check websi
Good day to you sir,
A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and
better pay was a few letters behind your name?
Well now you can get them!
BA BSc MAMScMBA PhD
Within 2 wee
I'm new, it's Julie :) Alot of the times I feel weird, even my girlfriends
told me that old time friend suggested
to put my hot videos somehow online. My website is like my new hobby :D AllCome
check website I put together, I'm not that good tho with comp skills yet but
tell me what you t
Good day,
A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and
better pay was a few letters behind your name?
Well now you can get them!
BA BSc MAMScMBA PhD
Within 2 weeks! No
Good day,
A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and
better pay was a few letters behind your name?
Well now you can get them!
BA BSc MAMScMBA PhD
Within 2 weeks! No
On 05-Aug-17 12:52, Steve Langasek wrote:
> No, that doesn't solve the problem. How are you supposed to invoke a
> 64-bit linker for a bi-arch build being done on a 32-bit buildd?
I guess you will generally have many more issues than this one when you
try to build 64-bit packages on a 32-bit bui
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Aug-17 17:00, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > For those following, the problem is that people are building 64-bit
> > libraries on a 32-bit platform (or the other way around) as part of the
> > package build. dpkg-shlibdeps us
On 05-Aug-17 17:00, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> For those following, the problem is that people are building 64-bit
> libraries on a 32-bit platform (or the other way around) as part of the
> package build. dpkg-shlibdeps uses plain old "ldd" to find out the
> dependencies of a binary or shared l
Quite a few of NPTL bugs have been fixed in libc6 version 2.3.5-3.
Especially this one:
NPTL (0.60) quirks with pthread_create (ignores attributes)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266507
Subscribers of this list (and other Linux Audio related lists) will
remember that there have
Good day to you sir,
A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and
better pay was a few letters behind your name?
Well now you can get them!
BA BSc MAMScMBA PhD
Within 2 wee
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:01:25PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I expect a future biarch (that provides x86_64 and i386 packages at
> > the same time on the same machine) saves this problem. During
> > DebConf5, Scott proposed dpkg filter mechanism, and Tollef propos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317082 libc6-dev,dpkg-dev
Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-dev' to `libc6-dev,dpkg-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 317082 libc6-dev,dpkg-dev
thanks
I managed to grab Matthias Klose and he helped me get a working demo of
the problem on my lowly i386, and I understand the bug now -- there's
some missing context in the above mails.
For those following, the problem is that people are building 64-bit
libr
On Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:59 AM, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
>>
>> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
>>
>> The last word should surely be
Accepted:
libc6-dbg_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
glibc_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libc6_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
nscd_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-dbg_2.3.5-3.0.1_hppa.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.5-3.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> merge 323560 321712
Bug#321712: libc6: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol
__res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE
Bug#323560: libc6: Relocation error: undefi
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After apt-get upgrade (on 10th of Aug, 2005) everything seemed to went fine.
Days later I got reports from users that mailing lists served by Ecartis broke.
In the Ecartis logs I found this:
/usr/lib/exim
Package: glibc
gcc itself cannot depend on those, without sucking in 64bit glibc
packages.
diff -u glibc-2.3.5/debian/control.in/sparc64
glibc-2.3.5/debian/control.in/sparc64
--- glibc-2.3.5/debian/control.in/sparc64
+++ glibc-2.3.5/debian/control.in/sparc64
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
Architecture: spa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> reassign 321717 libc6
Bug#321717: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Error 14
Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about "executable stack"
Bug reass
32 matches
Mail list logo
