Bug#418813: locales 2.5.1 can't install since it depends on glibc-2.5.0-0exp2 (not available in unstable)

2007-04-11 Thread Bruce MacDonald
Package: locales Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The subject says it all. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 (PREEMP

Bug#418767: [l10n] Updated Czech translation of glibc debconf messages

2007-04-11 Thread Miroslav Kure
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is updated Czech (cs.po) translation of glibc debconf messages. Please include it with the package. Thanks -- Miroslav Kure # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is

Bug#418748: glibc: [INTL:ru] Updated Russian debconf templates translation

2007-04-11 Thread Yuri Kozlov
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Updated Russian debconf templates translation is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-am

Bug#418720: glibc: [INTL:es] Updated Spanish debconf templates translation

2007-04-11 Thread Carlos Valdivia Yagüe
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n Updated Spanish debconf templates translation is attached. Bye, Carlos. # glibc debconf translation to spanish # Copyright (C) 2003, 2006, 2007 Software in the Public Interest # This file is distributed under the same license as the glibc package. # #

Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-04-11 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a > reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils > update? For when is the binutils update scheduled? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-04-11 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 405738 found 405738 2.5-1 apparently the build dependency has been dropped again; was there a reason to rush the glibc upload and not to wait for the binutils update? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed (with 3 errors): Re: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50)

2007-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 405738 Bug#405738: glibc should build-depend on binutils (>= 2.17.50) 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 40