Is there any temporary workaround as I quickly need to upgrade my system
from etch.
Thanks,
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Company Name Zurich Gruppe (Deutch Division)
Job Category Accounting/Finance; Account/Manager
Location USA
Position Type Full-Time, Employee, Part-Time
Salary USD25K -USD50K
Experience 1+
Desired Education Level High School or Equivalent
Date Posted February 17, 2008
Leading international company
Author: aurel32
Date: 2008-02-27 20:43:56 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 2833
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/powerpc.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #465753,
regarding libc6 fails on upgrade from etch version / /lib/tls/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_out_of_memory
to be marked as done
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468080: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #468080,
regarding [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for glibc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468091: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #468091,
regarding glibc : [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #465753,
regarding libc6: doesn't upgrade from etch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#466482: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #466482,
regarding Locales: es_CR.UTF-8 lacks 12-hour format in LC_TIME
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#467509: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #467509,
regarding libc6: ldconfig.8: include aux cache option
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #465753,
regarding libc6: Can't upgrade from Etch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468082: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #468082,
regarding glibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #465753,
regarding libc6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468072: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #468072,
regarding glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468099: fixed in glibc 2.7-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #468099,
regarding glibc: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Accepted:
glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb
glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz
glibc_2.7-9.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-9.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.7-9_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.7-9_amd64.deb
libc6-dev-i386_2.7-9_amd
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-i386_2.7-9_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
glibc_2.7-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glibc_2.7-9.dsc
glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb
locales_2.7-9_all.deb
libc6_2.7-9_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.7-9_amd64.deb
libc6-prof_2.7-9_amd64.deb
libc6-pic_2.7-9_amd64.deb
locales-all_2.7
Author: aurel32
Date: 2008-02-27 18:15:18 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 2831
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk
Log:
Use gcc-4.3 on sparc
Mod
Author: aurel32
Date: 2008-02-27 18:12:00 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 2830
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/de.po
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/gl.po
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/ja.po
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/pt.po
gli
Author: aurel32
Date: 2008-02-27 18:05:54 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 2829
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-amd64.mk
glibc-package/trunk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 468082 + pending
Bug#468082: glibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 468080 + pending
Bug#468080: [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for glibc
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 468072 + pending
Bug#468072: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 468099 + pending
Bug#468099: glibc: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 468091 + pending
Bug#468091: glibc : [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf
messages
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processi
Author: aurel32
Date: 2008-02-27 18:02:44 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 2828
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/ca.po
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/es.po
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/lt.po
Log:
* Update Lithuanian debconf translatio
Michael Prokop a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> #465753 has been tagged pending. Does that mean, that glibc >2.7-8
> will fix the /lib/tls/* ("symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version
> GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined") problem? Is there any roadmap when that
It means that the fix is already in the SVN.
> update will hit
Hi,
#465753 has been tagged pending. Does that mean, that glibc >2.7-8
will fix the /lib/tls/* ("symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version
GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined") problem? Is there any roadmap when that
update will hit unstable?
thx && regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : -
Date : 2008-02-26 18:54
[...cut...]
> > Setting debug-level to 16383 in /etc/nscd.conf, and running nscd -d in
> > a terminal gives the following crash before a few minutes to hours
(even
> > when nscd was started after invalidating the caches
29 matches
Mail list logo