Bug#467462: temporary workaround exists?

2008-02-27 Thread Jan Capek
Is there any temporary workaround as I quickly need to upgrade my system from etch. Thanks, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#95254: Part time work availble

2008-02-27 Thread fonzie balthazar
Company Name Zurich Gruppe (Deutch Division) Job Category Accounting/Finance; Account/Manager Location USA Position Type Full-Time, Employee, Part-Time Salary USD25K -USD50K Experience 1+ Desired Education Level High School or Equivalent Date Posted February 17, 2008 Leading international company

r2833 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in sysdeps

2008-02-27 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-27 20:43:56 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2833 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/powerpc.mk glibc-package/trunk/debian

Bug#467462: marked as done (libc6 fails on upgrade from etch version / /lib/tls/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #465753, regarding libc6 fails on upgrade from etch version / /lib/tls/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory to be marked as done

Bug#468080: marked as done ([INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for glibc)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468080: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #468080, regarding [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for glibc to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#468091: marked as done (glibc : [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468091: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #468091, regarding glibc : [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#466026: marked as done (libc6: doesn't upgrade from etch)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #465753, regarding libc6: doesn't upgrade from etch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#466482: marked as done (Locales: es_CR.UTF-8 lacks 12-hour format in LC_TIME)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#466482: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #466482, regarding Locales: es_CR.UTF-8 lacks 12-hour format in LC_TIME to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#467509: marked as done (libc6: ldconfig.8: include aux cache option)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#467509: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #467509, regarding libc6: ldconfig.8: include aux cache option to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#465844: marked as done (libc6: Can't upgrade from Etch)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #465753, regarding libc6: Can't upgrade from Etch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#468082: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468082: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #468082, regarding glibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#465753: marked as done (libc6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465753: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #465753, regarding libc6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#468072: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468072: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #468072, regarding glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#468099: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese debconf translation)

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468099: fixed in glibc 2.7-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #468099, regarding glibc: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese debconf translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

glibc_2.7-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz glibc_2.7-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.7-9.dsc libc6-dbg_2.7-9_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.7-9_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.7-9_amd

glibc override disparity

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.7-9_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Processing of glibc_2.7-9_amd64.changes

2008-02-27 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.7-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.7-9.dsc glibc_2.7-9.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.7-9_all.deb locales_2.7-9_all.deb libc6_2.7-9_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.7-9_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.7-9_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.7-9_amd64.deb locales-all_2.7

r2831 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in sysdeps

2008-02-27 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-27 18:15:18 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2831 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk Log: Use gcc-4.3 on sparc Mod

r2830 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . po

2008-02-27 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-27 18:12:00 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2830 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/de.po glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/gl.po glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/ja.po glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/pt.po gli

r2829 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in sysdeps

2008-02-27 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-27 18:05:54 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2829 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-amd64.mk glibc-package/trunk

Processed: tagging 468082

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 468082 + pending Bug#468082: glibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: tagging 468080

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 468080 + pending Bug#468080: [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for glibc Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Processed: tagging 468072

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 468072 + pending Bug#468072: glibc: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: tagging 468099

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 468099 + pending Bug#468099: glibc: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 468091

2008-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 468091 + pending Bug#468091: glibc : [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processi

r2828 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . po

2008-02-27 Thread aurel32
Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-02-27 18:02:44 + (Wed, 27 Feb 2008) New Revision: 2828 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/ca.po glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/es.po glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/lt.po Log: * Update Lithuanian debconf translatio

Bug#465753: pending? any news?

2008-02-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Michael Prokop a écrit : > Hi, > > #465753 has been tagged pending. Does that mean, that glibc >2.7-8 > will fix the /lib/tls/* ("symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version > GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined") problem? Is there any roadmap when that It means that the fix is already in the SVN. > update will hit

Bug#465753: pending? any news?

2008-02-27 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, #465753 has been tagged pending. Does that mean, that glibc >2.7-8 will fix the /lib/tls/* ("symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined") problem? Is there any roadmap when that update will hit unstable? thx && regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#467609: Re(2): Bug#467609: failed assertion in nscd (hstcache.c:364) on host name lookup

2008-02-27 Thread fabien . coutant
-Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : - Date : 2008-02-26 18:54 [...cut...] > > Setting debug-level to 16383 in /etc/nscd.conf, and running nscd -d in > > a terminal gives the following crash before a few minutes to hours (even > > when nscd was started after invalidating the caches